Lewkowitz Adam Korrick, Nakagawa Sanae, Thiet Mari-Paule, Rosenstein Melissa Greer
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;213(6):861.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.064. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
The objective of the study was to examine whether the stage of labor dystocia causing a primary cesarean delivery (CD) affects a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) success.
This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had primary CD of singleton pregnancies for first- or second-stage labor dystocia and attempted TOLAC at a single hospital between 2002 and 2014. We compared TOLAC success rates between women whose primary CD was for first- vs second-stage labor dystocia and investigated whether the effect of prior dystocia stage on TOLAC success was modified by previous vaginal delivery (VD).
A total of 238 women were included; nearly half (49%) achieved vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Women with a history of second-stage labor dystocia were more likely to have VBAC compared with those with first-stage dystocia, although this trend was not statistically significant among the general population (55% vs 45%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.4, 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.5]). However, among women without a prior VD, those with a history of second-stage dystocia did have statistically higher odds of achieving VBAC than those with prior first-stage dystocia (54% vs 38%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.8 [95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.3], P for interaction = .043).
Nearly half of women with a history of primary CD for labor dystocia will achieve VBAC. Women with a history of second-stage labor dystocia have a slightly higher VBAC rate, seen to a statistically significant degree in those without a history of prior VD. TOLAC should be offered to all eligible women and should not be discouraged in women with a prior second-stage arrest.
本研究的目的是探讨导致首次剖宫产(CD)的产程难产阶段是否会影响剖宫产术后阴道试产(TOLAC)的成功率。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2002年至2014年期间在一家医院因第一产程或第二产程难产进行首次单胎妊娠剖宫产且尝试进行TOLAC的女性。我们比较了首次剖宫产因第一产程难产与第二产程难产的女性的TOLAC成功率,并调查了既往难产阶段对TOLAC成功率的影响是否因既往阴道分娩(VD)而有所改变。
共纳入238名女性;近一半(49%)实现了剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)。有第二产程难产史的女性比有第一产程难产史的女性更有可能实现VBAC,尽管在总体人群中这一趋势无统计学意义(55%对45%,调整后的优势比为1.4,95%置信区间为0.8 - 2.5)。然而,在没有既往VD的女性中,有第二产程难产史的女性实现VBAC的几率在统计学上确实高于有第一产程难产史的女性(54%对38%,调整后的优势比为1.8 [95%置信区间为1.0 - 3.3],交互作用P值 = 0.043)。
有产程难产首次剖宫产史且有阴道试产意愿的女性中,近一半可实现VBAC。有第二产程难产史的女性VBAC率略高,在没有既往VD史的女性中具有统计学意义。应向所有符合条件的女性提供TOLAC,对于有既往第二产程停滞史的女性不应劝阻。