Duralde Erin R, Walter Louise C, Van Den Eeden Stephen K, Nakagawa Sanae, Subak Leslee L, Brown Jeanette S, Thom David H, Huang Alison J
University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;214(2):266.e1-266.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.072. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
More than a third of middle-aged or older women suffer from urinary incontinence, but less than half undergo evaluation or treatment for this burdensome condition. With national organizations now including an assessment of incontinence as a quality performance measure, providers and health care organizations have a growing incentive to identify and engage these women who are undiagnosed and untreated.
We sought to identify clinical and sociodemographic determinants of patient-provider discussion and treatment of incontinence among ethnically diverse, community-dwelling women.
We conducted an observational cohort study from 2003 through 2012 of 969 women aged 40 years and older enrolled in a Northern California integrated health care delivery system who reported at least weekly incontinence. Clinical severity, type, treatment, and discussion of incontinence were assessed by structured questionnaires. Multivariable regression evaluated predictors of discussion and treatment.
Mean age of the 969 participants was 59.9 (±9.7) years, and 55% were racial/ethnic minorities (171 black, 233 Latina, 133 Asian or Native American). Fifty-five percent reported discussing their incontinence with a health care provider, 36% within 1 year of symptom onset, and with only 3% indicating that their provider initiated the discussion. More than half (52%) reported being at least moderately bothered by their incontinence. Of these women, 324 (65%) discussed their incontinence with a clinician, with 200 (40%) doing so within 1 year of symptom onset. In a multivariable analysis, women were less likely to have discussed their incontinence if they had a household income < $30,000/y vs ≥ $120,000/y (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.86) or were diabetic (AOR, 0.71, 95% CI, 0.51-0.99). They were more likely to have discussed incontinence if they had clinically severe incontinence (AOR, 3.09, 95% CI, 1.89-5.07), depression (AOR, 1.71, 95% CI, 1.20-2.44), pelvic organ prolapse (AOR, 1.98, 95% CI, 1.13-3.46), or arthritis (AOR, 1.44, 95% CI, 1.06-1.95). Among the subset of women reporting at least moderate subjective bother from incontinence, black race (AOR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.25-0.81, vs white race) and income < $30,000/y (AOR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.17-0.81, vs ≥ $120,000/y) were associated with a reduced likelihood of discussing incontinence. Those with clinically severe incontinence (AOR, 2.93, 95% CI, 1.53-5.61, vs low to moderate incontinence by the Sandvik scale) were more likely to discuss it with a clinician.
Even in an integrated health care system, lower income was associated with decreased rates of patient-provider discussion of incontinence among women with at least weekly incontinence. Despite being at increased risk of incontinence, diabetic women were also less likely to have discussed incontinence or received care. Findings provide support for systematic screening of women to overcome barriers to evaluation and treatment.
超过三分之一的中老年女性患有尿失禁,但接受评估或治疗的人数不到一半,这种令人困扰的疾病给她们带来了沉重负担。随着国家组织将尿失禁评估纳入质量绩效指标,医疗服务提供者和医疗机构越来越有动力去识别并关注这些未被诊断和治疗的女性。
我们试图确定不同种族、居住在社区的女性患者与医疗服务提供者讨论尿失禁及接受治疗的临床和社会人口学决定因素。
我们于2003年至2012年对969名年龄在40岁及以上、参加北加利福尼亚综合医疗服务体系且至少每周有尿失禁症状的女性进行了一项观察性队列研究。通过结构化问卷评估尿失禁的临床严重程度、类型、治疗情况及讨论情况。多变量回归分析评估讨论和治疗的预测因素。
969名参与者的平均年龄为59.9(±9.7)岁,55%为少数族裔(171名黑人、233名拉丁裔、133名亚裔或美洲原住民)。55%的人报告曾与医疗服务提供者讨论过她们的尿失禁问题,36%在症状出现后1年内进行了讨论,只有3%表示是由医疗服务提供者发起的讨论。超过一半(52%)的人报告至少受到尿失禁的中度困扰。在这些女性中,324名(65%)与临床医生讨论过她们的尿失禁问题,其中200名(40%)在症状出现后1年内进行了讨论。在多变量分析中,家庭收入<30,000美元/年的女性与家庭收入≥120,000美元/年的女性相比,讨论尿失禁问题的可能性较小(调整后的优势比[AOR]为0.49,95%置信区间[CI]为0.28 - 0.86),糖尿病女性也是如此(AOR为0.71,95%CI为0.51 - 0.99)。如果女性患有临床严重尿失禁(AOR为3.09,95%CI为1.89 - 5.07)、抑郁症(AOR为1.71,95%CI为1.20 - 2.44)、盆腔器官脱垂(AOR为1.98,95%CI为1.13 - 3.46)或关节炎(AOR为1.44,95%CI为1.06 - 1.95),则更有可能讨论尿失禁问题。在报告至少受到尿失禁中度主观困扰的女性子集中,黑人种族(AOR为0.45,95%CI为0.25 - 0.81,与白人种族相比)和收入<30,000美元/年(AOR为0.37,95%CI为0.17 - 0.81,与≥120,000美元/年相比)与讨论尿失禁的可能性降低有关。与Sandvik量表评估为轻度至中度尿失禁的女性相比,患有临床严重尿失禁的女性(AOR为2.93,95%CI为1.53 - 5.61)更有可能与临床医生讨论尿失禁问题。
即使在综合医疗体系中,低收入与至少每周有尿失禁症状的女性患者与医疗服务提供者讨论尿失禁的比例降低有关。尽管糖尿病女性患尿失禁的风险增加,但她们讨论尿失禁或接受治疗的可能性也较小。研究结果为系统筛查女性以克服评估和治疗障碍提供了支持。