Taddio Anna, McMurtry C Meghan, Shah Vibhuti, Yoon Eugene W, Uleryk Elizabeth, Pillai Riddell Rebecca, Lang Eddy, Chambers Christine T, Noel Melanie, MacDonald Noni E
*Clinical Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto ¶Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto †Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children ∥Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital #Maternal-Infant Care (MiCare) Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital **Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto ‡Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Guelph Ontario §Children's Health Research Institute and Department of Paediatrics, Western University, London, ON ††Alberta Health Services, Fort McMurray ‡‡Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB ∥∥Department of Pediatrics/Psychology, IWK Health Centre §§Faculty of Science ##Department of Paediatrics, IWK Health Centre and Dalhousie University ***Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Halifax, NS, Canada ¶¶Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S12-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000263.
A knowledge synthesis was undertaken to inform the development of a revised and expanded clinical practice guideline about managing vaccination pain in children to include the management of pain across the lifespan and the management of fear in individuals with high levels of needle fear. This manuscript describes the methodological details of the knowledge synthesis and presents the list of included clinical questions, critical and important outcomes, search strategy, and search strategy results.
The Grading of Assessments, Recommendations, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and Cochrane methodologies provided the general framework. The project team voted on clinical questions for inclusion and critically important and important outcomes. A broad search strategy was used to identify relevant randomized-controlled trials and quasi-randomized-controlled trials. Quality of research evidence was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and quality across studies was assessed using GRADE. Multiple measures of the same construct within studies (eg, observer-rated and parent-rated infant distress) were combined before pooling. The standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI) or relative risk and 95% CI was used to express the effects of an intervention.
Altogether, 55 clinical questions were selected for inclusion in the knowledge synthesis; 49 pertained to pain management during vaccine injections and 6 pertained to fear management in individuals with high levels of needle fear. Pain, fear, and distress were typically prioritized as critically important outcomes across clinical questions. The search strategy identified 136 relevant studies.
This manuscript describes the methodological details of a knowledge synthesis about pain management during vaccination and fear management in individuals with high levels of needle fear. Subsequent manuscripts in this series will present the results for the included questions.
开展了一项知识综合研究,以为修订和扩展的关于儿童疫苗接种疼痛管理的临床实践指南提供信息,该指南将涵盖全生命周期的疼痛管理以及对针恐惧程度高的个体的恐惧管理。本手稿描述了知识综合研究的方法学细节,并列出了纳入的临床问题、关键和重要结局、检索策略及检索策略结果。
评估、推荐、制定与评价分级(GRADE)和Cochrane方法提供了总体框架。项目团队对纳入的临床问题以及关键和重要结局进行了投票。采用广泛的检索策略来识别相关的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究证据的质量,并使用GRADE评估各研究间的质量。在汇总之前,将研究中同一结构的多个测量指标(例如,观察者评定和家长评定的婴儿痛苦程度)进行合并。采用标准化均数差和95%置信区间(CI)或相对危险度和95%CI来表示干预效果。
总共选择了55个临床问题纳入知识综合研究;其中49个与疫苗注射期间的疼痛管理有关,6个与针恐惧程度高的个体的恐惧管理有关。疼痛、恐惧和痛苦通常被列为所有临床问题的关键重要结局。检索策略共识别出136项相关研究。
本手稿描述了关于疫苗接种期间疼痛管理以及针恐惧程度高的个体恐惧管理的知识综合研究的方法学细节。本系列的后续手稿将呈现纳入问题的结果。