Fernandez Maria M, Hogue Susan, Preblick Ronald, Kwong Winghan Jacqueline
RTI-Health Solutions, Market Access and Outcomes Strategy, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc., Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015 Aug 28;7:451-62. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S85635. eCollection 2015.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second most common medical complication and a cause of excess length of hospital stay. Its incidence and economic burden are expected to increase as the population ages. We reviewed the recent literature to provide updated cost estimates on VTE management.
Literature search strategies were performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Collaboration, Health Economic Evaluations Database, EconLit, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 2003-2014. Additional studies were identified through searching bibliographies of related publications.
Eighteen studies were identified and are summarized in this review; of these, 13 reported data from the USA, four from Europe, and one from Canada. Three main cost estimations were identified: cost per VTE hospitalization or per VTE readmission; cost for VTE management, usually reported annually or during a specific period; and annual all-cause costs in patients with VTE, which included the treatment of complications and comorbidities. Cost estimates per VTE hospitalization were generally similar across the US studies, with a trend toward an increase over time. Cost per pulmonary embolism hospitalization increased from $5,198-$6,928 in 2000 to $8,764 in 2010. Readmission for recurrent VTE was generally more costly than the initial index event admission. Annual health plan payments for services related to VTE also increased from $10,804-$16,644 during the 1998-2004 period to an estimated average of $15,123 for a VTE event from 2008 to 2011. Lower costs for VTE hospitalizations and annualized all-cause costs were estimated in European countries and Canada.
Costs for VTE treatment are considerable and increasing faster than general inflation for medical care services, with hospitalization costs being the primary cost driver. Readmissions for VTE are generally more costly than the initial VTE admission. Further studies evaluating the economic impact of new treatment options such as the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on VTE treatment are warranted.
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是第二常见的医疗并发症,也是导致住院时间延长的一个原因。随着人口老龄化,其发病率和经济负担预计将会增加。我们回顾了近期文献,以提供VTE管理的最新成本估计。
在2003年至2014年期间,在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane协作网、卫生经济评估数据库、EconLit和国际药学文摘中进行了文献检索策略。通过检索相关出版物的参考文献确定了其他研究。
本综述确定并总结了18项研究;其中,13项报告了来自美国的数据,4项来自欧洲,1项来自加拿大。确定了三项主要成本估计:每次VTE住院或每次VTE再入院的成本;VTE管理成本,通常按年度或特定时期报告;以及VTE患者的年度全因成本,其中包括并发症和合并症的治疗。美国各项研究中每次VTE住院的成本估计总体相似,且有随时间增加的趋势。肺栓塞住院成本从2000年的5198美元至6928美元增加到2010年的8764美元。复发性VTE再入院的成本通常高于初次索引事件入院。1998年至2004年期间,与VTE相关服务的年度健康计划支付也从10804美元至16644美元增加到2008年至2011年VTE事件估计平均为15123美元。欧洲国家和加拿大估计VTE住院成本和年度全因成本较低。
VTE治疗成本相当可观,且增长速度快于医疗服务的总体通胀,住院成本是主要成本驱动因素。VTE再入院的成本通常高于初次VTE入院。有必要进一步开展研究,评估新型治疗选择(如非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂)对VTE治疗的经济影响。