Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2014 Jun;2(2):124-33. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2014.00002. Epub 2014 Jun 15.
Management of hepatitis C (HCV) in liver transplantation (LT) population presents unique challenges. Suboptimal graft survival in HCV+ LT recipients is attributable to universal HCV recurrence following LT. Although eradication of HCV prior to LT is ideal for the prevention of HCV recurrence it is often limited by adverse events, particularly in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Antiviral therapy in LT candidates needs careful monitoring, and prophylaxis with HCV antibodies is ineffective. Early antiviral therapy after LT has been investigated, but no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Protocol liver biopsy is generally recommended in HCV+ LT recipients, and antiviral therapy can be considered in those with severe/progressive HCV recurrence. Sustained virological response (SVR) can be achieved in approximately 30% of LT recipients with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) with survival benefit, but adverse effects are common. Favorable patient characteristics for response to therapy include non-1 genotype, previously untreated, low baseline HCV-RNA, and donor IL28B genotype CC. Direct acting antiviral (DAA)-based triple therapy is associated with higher rates of SVR, but with similar or slightly higher rates of side effects, and immunosuppressive regimens need to be closely monitored and adjusted during the treatment period. Notably, the safety and efficacy of HCV treatment are very likely to improve with newer generation DAA. The benefit of immunosuppressive strategy on the natural history HCV recurrence has not been well elucidated. Based upon available evidence, cyclosporine A (CSA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and sirolimus appear to have a neutral or small beneficial impact on HCV recurrence. Donor interleukin 28 B (IL28B) polymorphisms appear to impact the course and treatment outcomes in recurrent HCV. Retransplantation should be considered for patients with reasonable survival probability.
肝移植(LT)人群中丙型肝炎(HCV)的管理具有独特的挑战。HCV+LT 受者移植物存活率低是由于 LT 后普遍存在 HCV 复发。虽然 LT 前消除 HCV 是预防 HCV 复发的理想方法,但由于不良事件,特别是在晚期肝硬化患者中,这种方法往往受到限制。LT 候选者的抗病毒治疗需要仔细监测,而 HCV 抗体预防无效。已经研究了 LT 后早期抗病毒治疗,但尚未证明有明确的益处。一般建议对 HCV+LT 受者进行方案肝活检,如果 HCV 复发严重/进行性加重,则可以考虑抗病毒治疗。约 30%的接受聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林(PEG-IFN/RBV)治疗的 LT 受者可获得持续病毒学应答(SVR),并具有生存获益,但不良反应常见。对治疗有反应的有利患者特征包括非 1 基因型、未经治疗、基线 HCV-RNA 低和供体 IL28B 基因型 CC。基于直接作用抗病毒(DAA)的三联疗法与更高的 SVR 率相关,但副作用率相似或略高,在治疗期间需要密切监测和调整免疫抑制方案。值得注意的是,新一代 DAA 很可能提高 HCV 治疗的安全性和疗效。免疫抑制策略对 HCV 自然史复发的影响尚未得到很好的阐明。根据现有证据,环孢素 A(CSA)、霉酚酸酯(MMF)和西罗莫司似乎对 HCV 复发有中性或较小的有益影响。供体白细胞介素 28B(IL28B)多态性似乎会影响复发性 HCV 的病程和治疗结果。对于具有合理生存概率的患者,应考虑再次肝移植。