Chen Yaozhu J, Makin Charles, Bollu Vamsi K, Navaie Maryam, Celli Bartolome R
a Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , South San Francisco , CA , USA.
b HEOR & Strategic Market Access, Mapi Group , Boston , MA , USA.
J Med Econ. 2016;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1079530. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
This retrospective cohort study compared exacerbations, health services utilization, and costs among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients who received nebulized arformoterol or nebulized formoterol therapy.
Using PharMetrics Plus health plan claims, 417 nebulized long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) users meeting the study inclusion criteria were identified: had ≥2 fills of nebulized arformoterol or nebulized formoterol from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2011, adhered to using their index drug ≥60% of the days during 1 year post-index, were ≥35 years old and continuously enrolled 180 days pre- and 1 year post-index, and did not use a nebulized LABA or have an asthma diagnosis during the pre-index period. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed.
A total of 274 nebulized arformoterol users and 143 nebulized formoterol users were identified with comparable demographic characteristics. However, significant differences were observed between the two groups in some clinical characteristics at index including comorbidities and use of antibiotics. At 1 year post-index, a lower proportion of nebulized arformoterol users had ≥1 exacerbation compared to nebulized formoterol users (70.4% vs 80.4%; p = 0.028). Among patients with ≥1 hospital admission, COPD-related costs per inpatient stay were significantly lower for nebulized arformoterol users than nebulized formoterol users (median = $9542 vs $14,025; p = 0.009). After controlling for confounders, nebulized arformoterol users had 19% marginally lower risk of exacerbations than nebulized formoterol users (hazard ratio = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.64-1.03; p < 0.084) and 14.4% marginally lower COPD-related total costs at 1 year post-index (p = 0.062), primarily related to fewer hospital readmissions (7.6% vs 12.2%) and lower average costs per readmission stay (median = $7392 vs $18 081; p = 0.006).
This study suggests that the choice of nebulized LABA may influence COPD-related exacerbation occurrence and costs. Future studies with larger and more closely matched nebulized arformoterol and nebulized formoterol users are needed to confirm these findings.
这项回顾性队列研究比较了接受雾化阿福特罗或雾化福莫特罗治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的病情加重情况、医疗服务利用情况和费用。
利用PharMetrics Plus健康计划索赔数据,确定了417名符合研究纳入标准的雾化长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)使用者:在2009年1月1日至2011年12月31日期间有≥2次雾化阿福特罗或雾化福莫特罗的配药记录,在索引药物使用后的1年中≥60%的天数坚持使用该药物,年龄≥35岁且在索引前180天和索引后1年持续参保,并且在索引前期间未使用雾化LABA或患有哮喘。进行了描述性和多变量分析。
共确定了274名雾化阿福特罗使用者和143名雾化福莫特罗使用者,他们具有可比的人口统计学特征。然而,两组在索引时的一些临床特征(包括合并症和抗生素使用)方面存在显著差异。在索引后1年,与雾化福莫特罗使用者相比,雾化阿福特罗使用者中发生≥1次病情加重的比例更低(70.4%对80.4%;p = 0.028)。在有≥1次住院的患者中,雾化阿福特罗使用者每次住院的COPD相关费用显著低于雾化福莫特罗使用者(中位数 = 9542美元对14,025美元;p = 0.009)。在控制混杂因素后,雾化阿福特罗使用者病情加重的风险比雾化福莫特罗使用者低19%(风险比 = 0.81,95%置信区间 = 0.64 - 1.03;p < 0.084),并且在索引后1年COPD相关总费用低14.4%(p = 0.062),主要与再入院次数减少(7.6%对12.2%)和每次再入院住院的平均费用降低(中位数 = 7392美元对18,081美元;p = 0.006)有关。
本研究表明,雾化LABA的选择可能会影响COPD相关病情加重的发生和费用。需要开展更大规模且雾化阿福特罗和雾化福莫特罗使用者匹配度更高的未来研究来证实这些发现。