Lovelace Clinic Foundation, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
J Med Econ. 2011;14(6):769-76. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.622817. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
To compare the effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BFC) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC), two combination inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist (ICS/LABA) products approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the US with respect to cost, therapy adherence, and related healthcare utilization. The effectiveness of these two treatments has not previously been compared in a US COPD population.
A retrospective cohort study assessed COPD-related outcomes using administrative claims data among ICS/LABA-naïve patients. Patients initiating BFC were propensity matched to FSC patients. Cost and effectiveness were measured as total healthcare expenditures, exacerbation events (hospitalizations, emergency department visits, or outpatient visits associated with oral corticosteroid or antibiotic prescription fills), and treatment medication adherence. Differences in COPD symptom control were assessed via proxy measure through claims for rescue medications and outpatient encounters.
Of the 6770 patients (3385 BFC and 3385 FSC), fewer BFC patients had claims for short-acting beta agonists (SABA) (34.7% vs 39.5%; p<0.001) and ipratropium (7.8% vs 9.8%, p<0.005) than FSC patients, but no substantial differences were seen in other clinical outcomes including tiotropium or nebulized SABA claims, COPD-related outpatient visits, or exacerbation events. There were no significant differences in total COPD-related medical costs in the 6-month period after initiation of combination therapy.
This was a retrospective observational study using claims data and accuracy of COPD diagnoses could not be verified, nor was information available on severity of disease. The results and conclusions of this study are limited to the population observed and the operational definitions of the study variables.
For most outcomes of interest, BFC and FSC showed comparable real-world effectiveness.
比较布地奈德/福莫特罗富马酸二水合物(BFC)和丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗(FSC)这两种在美国批准用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的联合吸入皮质类固醇/长效β-激动剂(ICS/LABA)产品的有效性,在成本、治疗依从性和相关医疗保健利用方面。这两种治疗方法以前没有在美国 COPD 人群中进行过比较。
一项回顾性队列研究使用 ICS/LABA 初治患者的行政索赔数据评估了 COPD 相关结局。启动 BFC 的患者与 FSC 患者进行倾向匹配。成本和有效性的测量指标为总医疗支出、加重事件(住院、急诊就诊或与口服皮质类固醇或抗生素处方填充相关的门诊就诊)和治疗药物依从性。通过索赔急救药物和门诊就诊来评估 COPD 症状控制的差异。
在 6770 名患者(3385 名 BFC 和 3385 名 FSC)中,与 FSC 患者相比,BFC 患者的短效β激动剂(SABA)(34.7%比 39.5%;p<0.001)和异丙托溴铵(7.8%比 9.8%,p<0.005)的索赔较少,但在其他临床结局(包括噻托溴铵或雾化 SABA 索赔、COPD 相关门诊就诊或加重事件)方面未见明显差异。在联合治疗启动后的 6 个月内,总 COPD 相关医疗费用没有显著差异。
这是一项使用索赔数据的回顾性观察研究,无法验证 COPD 诊断的准确性,也无法获取疾病严重程度的信息。本研究的结果和结论仅限于所观察的人群和研究变量的操作定义。
对于大多数感兴趣的结果,BFC 和 FSC 显示出相当的真实世界疗效。