Suppr超能文献

评估医疗数据库中 COPD 药物依从性的方法:系统评价。

Methods to assess COPD medications adherence in healthcare databases: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Bioanalysis, Pharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Sep 27;32(169). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0103-2023. Print 2023 Sep 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 report recommends medication adherence assessment in COPD as an action item. Healthcare databases provide opportunities for objective assessments; however, multiple methods exist. We aimed to systematically review the literature to describe existing methods to assess adherence in COPD in healthcare databases and to evaluate the reporting of influencing variables.

METHOD

We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase for peer-reviewed articles evaluating adherence to COPD medication in electronic databases, written in English, published up to 11 October 2022 (PROSPERO identifier CRD42022363449). Two reviewers independently conducted screening for inclusion and performed data extraction. Methods to assess initiation (dispensing of medication after prescribing), implementation (extent of use over a specific time period) and/or persistence (time from initiation to discontinuation) were listed descriptively. Each included study was evaluated for reporting variables with an impact on adherence assessment: inpatient stays, drug substitution, dose switching and early refills.

RESULTS

160 studies were included, of which four assessed initiation, 135 implementation and 45 persistence. Overall, one method was used to measure initiation, 43 methods for implementation and seven methods for persistence. Most of the included implementation studies reported medication possession ratio, proportion of days covered and/or an alteration of these methods. Only 11% of the included studies mentioned the potential impact of the evaluated variables.

CONCLUSION

Variations in adherence assessment methods are common. Attention to transparency, reporting of variables with an impact on adherence assessment and rationale for choosing an adherence cut-off or treatment gap is recommended.

摘要

背景

2023 年全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议报告建议将药物依从性评估作为慢阻肺的一项行动项目。医疗保健数据库为客观评估提供了机会;然而,存在多种方法。我们旨在系统地回顾文献,描述医疗保健数据库中评估慢阻肺患者药物依从性的现有方法,并评估报告影响变量的情况。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Embase 中截至 2022 年 10 月 11 日发表的评估电子数据库中慢阻肺药物依从性的同行评议文章,语言为英文(PROSPERO 标识符 CRD42022363449)。两名审查员独立进行筛选以纳入研究并提取数据。列出了评估起始(开处方后配药)、实施(特定时间段内的使用程度)和/或持续(从起始到停药的时间)的方法。用报告对依从性评估有影响的变量(住院、药物替代、剂量转换和提前配药)评估每个纳入的研究。

结果

纳入了 160 项研究,其中 4 项评估起始,135 项评估实施,45 项评估持续。总体而言,有 1 种方法用于测量起始,43 种方法用于测量实施,7 种方法用于测量持续。纳入的大多数实施研究报告了药物持有率、覆盖天数比和/或这些方法的改变。只有 11%的纳入研究提到了评估变量的潜在影响。

结论

药物依从性评估方法的差异很常见。建议关注透明度,报告对药物依从性评估有影响的变量以及选择药物依从性截止值或治疗差距的依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ec5/10523153/f6204308fa11/ERR-0103-2023.01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验