Suppr超能文献

改善对错误反馈的记忆。

Improved memory for error feedback.

作者信息

Van der Borght Liesbet, Schouppe Nathalie, Notebaert Wim

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2016 Nov;80(6):1049-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0705-6. Epub 2015 Sep 10.

Abstract

Surprising feedback in a general knowledge test leads to an improvement in memory for both the surface features and the content of the feedback (Psychon Bull Rev 16:88-92, 2009). Based on the idea that in cognitive tasks, error is surprising (the orienting account, Cognition 111:275-279, 2009), we tested whether error feedback would be better remembered than correct feedback. Colored words were presented as feedback signals in a flanker task, where the color indicated the accuracy. Subsequently, these words were again presented during a recognition task (Experiment 1) or a lexical decision task (Experiments 2 and 3). In all experiments, memory was improved for words seen as error feedback. These results are compared to the attentional boost effect (J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 39:1223-12231, 2013) and related to the orienting account for post-error slowing (Cognition 111:275-279, 2009).

摘要

常识测试中令人惊讶的反馈会提高对反馈的表面特征和内容的记忆(《心理通报与评论》16:88 - 92,2009年)。基于认知任务中错误令人惊讶这一观点(定向账户,《认知》111:275 - 279,2009年),我们测试了错误反馈是否比正确反馈更容易被记住。在侧翼任务中,彩色单词作为反馈信号呈现,颜色表示准确性。随后,这些单词在识别任务(实验1)或词汇判断任务(实验2和3)中再次呈现。在所有实验中,被视为错误反馈的单词的记忆都得到了改善。这些结果与注意力增强效应(《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》39:1223 - 12231,2013年)进行了比较,并与错误后反应减慢的定向账户(《认知》111:275 - 279,2009年)相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验