Van der Borght Liesbet, Schouppe Nathalie, Notebaert Wim
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Psychol Res. 2016 Nov;80(6):1049-1058. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0705-6. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
Surprising feedback in a general knowledge test leads to an improvement in memory for both the surface features and the content of the feedback (Psychon Bull Rev 16:88-92, 2009). Based on the idea that in cognitive tasks, error is surprising (the orienting account, Cognition 111:275-279, 2009), we tested whether error feedback would be better remembered than correct feedback. Colored words were presented as feedback signals in a flanker task, where the color indicated the accuracy. Subsequently, these words were again presented during a recognition task (Experiment 1) or a lexical decision task (Experiments 2 and 3). In all experiments, memory was improved for words seen as error feedback. These results are compared to the attentional boost effect (J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 39:1223-12231, 2013) and related to the orienting account for post-error slowing (Cognition 111:275-279, 2009).
常识测试中令人惊讶的反馈会提高对反馈的表面特征和内容的记忆(《心理通报与评论》16:88 - 92,2009年)。基于认知任务中错误令人惊讶这一观点(定向账户,《认知》111:275 - 279,2009年),我们测试了错误反馈是否比正确反馈更容易被记住。在侧翼任务中,彩色单词作为反馈信号呈现,颜色表示准确性。随后,这些单词在识别任务(实验1)或词汇判断任务(实验2和3)中再次呈现。在所有实验中,被视为错误反馈的单词的记忆都得到了改善。这些结果与注意力增强效应(《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》39:1223 - 12231,2013年)进行了比较,并与错误后反应减慢的定向账户(《认知》111:275 - 279,2009年)相关。