Department of Psychology & Neuroscience Program, Elon University, Elon, NC, USA.
Department of Psychology, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Memory. 2021 Sep;29(8):1017-1042. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1957937. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Numerous studies have established that there are benefits of corrective feedback for learning, but the mechanisms of this benefit are not well understood. An important question is whether corrective feedback improves memory via episodic processes or solely via semantic mediation. If episodic processes are involved, then memory for corrective feedback should include contextual details of the feedback episode. The present study tested this hypothesis across 3 experiments (total = 223) in which participants completed an encoding task that involved cued guessing of category exemplars. Exemplars generated by participants were equally likely to be treated as correct or incorrect, and the "correct" exemplar was presented within a feedback display after each response. Separate versions of the task manipulated font colour in either the feedback display or the initial cue/typed response display. Participants were instructed to remember either the correct exemplars or their own typed responses, and the corresponding font colours. Retrieval task (cued recall, free recall, recognition) was varied across experiments. Across all 3 experiments, a higher rate of memory accuracy was observed for context associated with corrective feedback relative to other conditions. The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that errorful learning involves episodic memory, not merely semantic mediation.
许多研究已经证实,纠错反馈对学习有好处,但这种好处的机制尚不清楚。一个重要的问题是,纠错反馈是否通过情景记忆过程或仅通过语义中介来改善记忆。如果涉及情景记忆过程,那么对纠错反馈的记忆应该包括反馈情景的上下文细节。本研究通过 3 个实验(共 223 名参与者)检验了这一假设,在这些实验中,参与者完成了一个涉及提示猜测类别示例的编码任务。参与者生成的示例同样有可能被视为正确或错误,并且在每次响应后,“正确”示例将在反馈显示中呈现。任务的单独版本分别在反馈显示或初始提示/键入响应显示中操纵字体颜色。参与者被指示记住正确的示例或他们自己键入的响应,以及相应的字体颜色。在实验中变化的检索任务(提示回忆、自由回忆、识别)。在所有 3 个实验中,与其他条件相比,与纠错反馈相关的上下文的记忆准确性更高。这些发现与错误学习涉及情景记忆而不仅仅是语义中介的假设一致。