Suppr超能文献

[两种镇痛方案对单侧全膝关节置换术后镇痛及膝关节功能恢复的影响——一项随机对照试验]

[Effects of two analgesic regimens on the postoperative analgesia and knee functional recovery after unilateral total knee arthroplasty-a randomized controlled trial].

作者信息

Ren Li, Peng Lihua, Qin Peipei, Min Su

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China; Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jul 1;53(7):522-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of continuous femoral block on the postoperative analgesia and functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Two hundreds and eighty patients who underwent TKA were randomized into two groups:the group receiving continuous femoral block (CFNB) and the group receiving patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), each group included 140 participants. Femoral nerve block with ropivacaine by ultrasonic guidance was performed in group CFNB and group PCIA were administrated with patient controlled intravenous analgesia. Numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and in motion at 24, 48, 72 h, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, also the NRS scores at hospital discharge were recorded. The incidence of moderate-severity pain, as well as the degree of knee flexion and the WOMAC scores at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery were analyzed. The rescue analgesic administration and analgesia-related adverse effects were also recorded. Data were expressed as mean± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed continuous variables and total number (percent frequency) for categorical variables. If non-normally distributed, data were expressed median inter-quartile range. Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank test were used to compare results for continuous variables, when appropriate. Chi-square test was used to compare results for categorical variable, Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables when the number of event was less than 5.

RESULTS

NRS scores of group CFNB in motion was 3 (3-4) at discharge time, and 3 (2-4), 3 (2-3) at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively, while the scores of group PCIA was 4 (4-4), 3 (3-4), 3 (3-4), respectively. And at rest, NRS scores of group CFNB was 3 (2-3), 1 (1-2), 1 (1-1) at discharge time, and 3, 6 months postoperatively. Compared with group PCIA, NRS scores in motion of group CFNB at discharge time (Z=-5.174, P<0.05) and 3 months (Z=2.308, P=0.021), as well as 6 months postoperatively (Z=-2.495, P=0.013), were significantly lower,also for the NRS scores at rest (Z=-2.405, P=0.016; Z=-4.360, P<0.05; Z=-9.268, P<0.05). The degree of knee flexion of group CFNB at 3 and 6 months postoperatively was 92 (88-97), 103 (99-106), while the degree of knee flexion of group PCIA was 89 (86-95), 100 (97-105); the WOMAC scores of group CFNB at 3 and 6 months postoperatively was 21 (18-26), 18 (16-22), while the scores of group PCIA was 24 (20-27), 21 (17-24). WOMAC scores of group CFNB was lower compared with group PCIA at 3 (Z=-2.467, P=0.014) and 6 (Z=-2.537, P=0.011) months postoperatively while the degree of knee flexion of group CFNB was higher (Z=-2.175, P=0.030; Z=-2.471, P=0.013). Moreover, the frequency of bolus and frequency of rescue of group CFNB was 2.3 and 0.6, while the frequency of group PCIA was 2.6 and 1.1, the frequency of bolus and frequency of rescue were lower in group CFNB (t=-2.984, P=0.003; t=-3.213, P=0.002). The incidence of adverse events such muscle weakness of low limbs,nausea and vomiting were similar in two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

CFNB can alleviate the postoperative pain after TKA with safety, help improving the short-middle-term functions of knee and quality of patients' lives.

摘要

目的

评估持续股神经阻滞对全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后镇痛及功能恢复的效果。

方法

280例行TKA的患者随机分为两组:持续股神经阻滞(CFNB)组和患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)组,每组140例。CFNB组采用超声引导下罗哌卡因股神经阻滞,PCIA组采用患者自控静脉镇痛。记录术后24、48、72小时、3、6和12个月静息及活动时的数字评分量表(NRS)评分,以及出院时的NRS评分。分析术后3、6和12个月中重度疼痛的发生率、膝关节屈曲度及WOMAC评分。记录补救性镇痛药物的使用情况及镇痛相关不良反应。对于正态分布的连续变量,数据以均数±标准差(SD)表示;对于分类变量,数据以总数(百分比频率)表示。若数据非正态分布,则以中位数四分位数间距表示。适当情况下,采用Student's t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验比较连续变量的结果。采用卡方检验比较分类变量的结果,当事件数小于5时,采用Fisher确切概率法比较分类变量。

结果

CFNB组出院时活动时的NRS评分为3(3 - 4),术后3个月和6个月分别为3(2 - 4)、3(2 - 3),而PCIA组分别为4(4 - 4)、3(3 - 4)、3(3 - 4)。静息时,CFNB组出院时、术后3个月和6个月的NRS评分分别为3(2 - 3)、1(1 - 2)、1(1 - 1)。与PCIA组相比,CFNB组出院时(Z = -5.174,P < 0.05)、术后3个月(Z = 2.308,P = 0.021)及6个月(Z = -2.495,P = 0.013)活动时的NRS评分显著更低,静息时的NRS评分也更低(Z = -2.405,P = 0.016;Z = -4.360,P < 0.05;Z = -9.268,P < 0.05)。CFNB组术后3个月和六个月的膝关节屈曲度分别为92(88 - 97)、103(99 - 106),而PCIA组分别为89(86 - 95)、100(97 - 105);CFNB组术后3个月和6个月的WOMAC评分为21(18 - 26)、18(16 - 22),而PCIA组分别为24(20 - 27)、21(17 - 24)。术后3个月(Z = -2.467,P = 0.014)和6个月(Z = -2.537,P = 0.01)时,CFNB组的WOMAC评分低于PCIA组,而CFNB组的膝关节屈曲度更高(Z = -2.175,P = 0.030;Z = -2.471,P = 0.013)。此外,CFNB组的推注次数和补救次数分别为2.3和0.6,而PCIA组分别为2.6和1.1,CFNB组的推注次数和补救次数更低(t = -2.984,P = 0.003;t = -3.213,P = 0.002)。两组下肢肌肉无力、恶心呕吐等不良事件的发生率相似(P > 0.05)。

结论

CFNB可安全减轻TKA术后疼痛,有助于改善膝关节的中短期功能及患者生活质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验