[比较全膝关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞与连续静脉镇痛的镇痛效果]
[Comparing the analgesic efficacy of continuous femoral nerve blockade and continuous intravenous analgesia after total knee arthroplasty].
作者信息
Wang Huai-jiang, Zhang Da-zhi, Li Shi-zhong
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Ji Shuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.
出版信息
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Sep 7;90(33):2360-2.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the analgesic efficacy of continuous femoral nerve blockade (CFNB) and continuous intravenous analgesia (CIA) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS
126 patients undergoing TKA under combined epidural-spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive either a femoral infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (median infusion rate 5 ml/h) (n = 63) or an intravenous infusion of fentanyl 30 µg/kg (2 ml/h) (n = 63). Adjuvant analgesics were oral celebrex or IM pethidine. In the CFNB group, CFNB was established before combined epidural-spinal anesthesia and 20 ml 0.5%ropivacaine was infused through the catheter placed near femoral nerve. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed at rest and on passive mobilization by acute pain service blinded to analgesic treatment. Nausea and vomiting, dizziness, satisfaction and other side-effects were assessed postoperatively.
RESULTS
There was significantly less VAS scores in the CFNB group comparing the CIA group at rest 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 h after surgery (P < 0.01). A significant difference in VAS scores was found in CFNB group vs CIA group on passive mobilization 24, 36, 48 h after operation (P < 0.01). There was significantly less dizziness, nausea and vomiting in the CFNB group (P < 0.01). Patient satisfaction was higher in the CFNB group (92.1%) than the CIA group (20.6%) (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
CFNA with ropivacaine 0.2% is more effective in controlling postoperative pain than CIA and CFNB is an effective regional component of a multimodal analgesic strategy after TKA.
目的
比较全膝关节置换术(TKA)后持续股神经阻滞(CFNB)与持续静脉镇痛(CIA)的镇痛效果。
方法
126例在硬膜外-脊髓联合麻醉下行TKA的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受0.2%罗哌卡因股神经输注(中位输注速率5 ml/h)(n = 63)或静脉输注30 μg/kg芬太尼(2 ml/h)(n = 63)。辅助镇痛药为口服塞来昔布或肌内注射哌替啶。在CFNB组,于硬膜外-脊髓联合麻醉前建立CFNB,通过置于股神经附近的导管注入20 ml 0.5%罗哌卡因。由对镇痛治疗不知情的急性疼痛服务小组在静息和被动活动时评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。术后评估恶心、呕吐、头晕、满意度及其他副作用。
结果
术后4、8、12、16、24、36、48 h静息时CFNB组的VAS评分显著低于CIA组(P < 0.01)。术后24、36、48 h被动活动时CFNB组与CIA组的VAS评分存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。CFNB组的头晕、恶心和呕吐明显较少(P < 0.01)。CFNB组的患者满意度(92.1%)高于CIA组(20.6%)(P < 0.01)。
结论
0.2%罗哌卡因的CFNA在控制术后疼痛方面比CIA更有效,且CFNB是TKA后多模式镇痛策略的有效区域组成部分。