• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[比较全膝关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞与连续静脉镇痛的镇痛效果]

[Comparing the analgesic efficacy of continuous femoral nerve blockade and continuous intravenous analgesia after total knee arthroplasty].

作者信息

Wang Huai-jiang, Zhang Da-zhi, Li Shi-zhong

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Ji Shuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Sep 7;90(33):2360-2.

PMID:21092500
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the analgesic efficacy of continuous femoral nerve blockade (CFNB) and continuous intravenous analgesia (CIA) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

126 patients undergoing TKA under combined epidural-spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive either a femoral infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (median infusion rate 5 ml/h) (n = 63) or an intravenous infusion of fentanyl 30 µg/kg (2 ml/h) (n = 63). Adjuvant analgesics were oral celebrex or IM pethidine. In the CFNB group, CFNB was established before combined epidural-spinal anesthesia and 20 ml 0.5%ropivacaine was infused through the catheter placed near femoral nerve. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were assessed at rest and on passive mobilization by acute pain service blinded to analgesic treatment. Nausea and vomiting, dizziness, satisfaction and other side-effects were assessed postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was significantly less VAS scores in the CFNB group comparing the CIA group at rest 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 h after surgery (P < 0.01). A significant difference in VAS scores was found in CFNB group vs CIA group on passive mobilization 24, 36, 48 h after operation (P < 0.01). There was significantly less dizziness, nausea and vomiting in the CFNB group (P < 0.01). Patient satisfaction was higher in the CFNB group (92.1%) than the CIA group (20.6%) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

CFNA with ropivacaine 0.2% is more effective in controlling postoperative pain than CIA and CFNB is an effective regional component of a multimodal analgesic strategy after TKA.

摘要

目的

比较全膝关节置换术(TKA)后持续股神经阻滞(CFNB)与持续静脉镇痛(CIA)的镇痛效果。

方法

126例在硬膜外-脊髓联合麻醉下行TKA的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受0.2%罗哌卡因股神经输注(中位输注速率5 ml/h)(n = 63)或静脉输注30 μg/kg芬太尼(2 ml/h)(n = 63)。辅助镇痛药为口服塞来昔布或肌内注射哌替啶。在CFNB组,于硬膜外-脊髓联合麻醉前建立CFNB,通过置于股神经附近的导管注入20 ml 0.5%罗哌卡因。由对镇痛治疗不知情的急性疼痛服务小组在静息和被动活动时评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。术后评估恶心、呕吐、头晕、满意度及其他副作用。

结果

术后4、8、12、16、24、36、48 h静息时CFNB组的VAS评分显著低于CIA组(P < 0.01)。术后24、36、48 h被动活动时CFNB组与CIA组的VAS评分存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。CFNB组的头晕、恶心和呕吐明显较少(P < 0.01)。CFNB组的患者满意度(92.1%)高于CIA组(20.6%)(P < 0.01)。

结论

0.2%罗哌卡因的CFNA在控制术后疼痛方面比CIA更有效,且CFNB是TKA后多模式镇痛策略的有效区域组成部分。

相似文献

1
[Comparing the analgesic efficacy of continuous femoral nerve blockade and continuous intravenous analgesia after total knee arthroplasty].[比较全膝关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞与连续静脉镇痛的镇痛效果]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Sep 7;90(33):2360-2.
2
[Effects of two analgesic regimens on the postoperative analgesia and knee functional recovery after unilateral total knee arthroplasty-a randomized controlled trial].[两种镇痛方案对单侧全膝关节置换术后镇痛及膝关节功能恢复的影响——一项随机对照试验]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jul 1;53(7):522-7.
3
Effectiveness of continuous versus single injection femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: A double blinded, randomized trial.全膝关节置换术中持续与单次注射股神经阻滞的有效性:一项双盲随机试验。
Knee. 2018 Aug;25(4):623-630. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
[Effect of continuous femoral nerve block combined with periarticular local infiltration analgesia on early operative functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized double-blind controlled study].[连续股神经阻滞联合关节周围局部浸润镇痛对全膝关节置换术后早期手术功能恢复的影响:一项随机双盲对照研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Feb 18;49(1):137-41.
5
Comparison of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB/SA) and continuous femoral nerve block with mini-dose spinal morphine (CFNB/SAMO) for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a randomized controlled study.全膝关节置换术(TKA)后连续股神经阻滞(CFNB/SA)与小剂量脊髓吗啡连续股神经阻滞(CFNB/SAMO)用于术后镇痛的比较:一项随机对照研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul 16;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0205-2.
6
Continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty for mobilisation capability and pain treatment: a randomised and blinded clinical trial.全膝关节置换术后连续收肌管阻滞与连续股神经阻滞对活动能力及疼痛治疗的效果:一项随机双盲临床试验
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Mar;136(3):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2403-7. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
A comparison of continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB) and continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in postoperative analgesia and knee rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).全膝关节置换术(TKA)后连续股神经阻滞(CFNB)与连续硬膜外输注(CEI)在术后镇痛及膝关节康复中的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Mar;92(3):328-34.
8
Stimulating catheters for continuous femoral nerve blockade after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial.全膝关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞的刺激导管:一项随机、对照、双盲试验。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Apr;106(4):1316-21, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318164efd1.
9
[Comparison of the influences of continuous femoral nerve block and patient controlled intravenous analgesia on total knee arthroplasty].连续股神经阻滞与患者自控静脉镇痛对全膝关节置换术影响的比较
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2010 Oct;32(5):574-8. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2010.05.021.
10
Continuous femoral nerve block and patient-controlled intravenous postoperative analgesia on Th1/Th2 in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后连续股神经阻滞与患者自控静脉术后镇痛对 Th1/Th2 的影响。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018 May-Jun;32(3):641-647.

引用本文的文献

1
Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery.膝关节置换术后急性疼痛的股神经阻滞
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD009941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009941.pub2.