Huang Shu-Chun, Wong May-Kuen, Lin Pyng-Jing, Tsai Feng-Chun, Wen Ming-Shien, Kuo Chi-Tai, Hsu Chih-Chin, Wang Jong-Shyan
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkuo, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkuo, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 11;10(9):e0137846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137846. eCollection 2015.
Hemodynamic properties affected by the passive leg raise test (PLRT) reflect cardiac pumping efficiency. In the present study, we aimed to further explore whether PLRT predicts exercise intolerance/capacity following coronary revascularization. Following coronary bypass/percutaneous coronary intervention, 120 inpatients underwent a PLRT and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) 2-12 days during post-surgery hospitalization and 3-5 weeks after hospital discharge. The PLRT included head-up, leg raise, and supine rest postures. The end point of the first CPET during admission was the supra-ventilatory anaerobic threshold, whereas that during the second CPET in the outpatient stage was maximal performance. Bio-reactance-based non-invasive cardiac output monitoring was employed during PLRT to measure real-time stroke volume and cardiac output. A correlation matrix showed that stroke volume during leg raise (SVLR) during the first PLRT was positively correlated (R = 0.653) with the anaerobic threshold during the first CPET. When exercise intolerance was defined as an anaerobic threshold < 3 metabolic equivalents, SVLR / body weight had an area under curve value of 0.822, with sensitivity of 0.954, specificity of 0.593, and cut-off value of 1504·10-3mL/kg (positive predictive value 0.72; negative predictive value 0.92). Additionally, cardiac output during leg raise (COLR) during the first PLRT was related to peak oxygen consumption during the second CPET (R = 0.678). When poor aerobic fitness was defined as peak oxygen consumption < 5 metabolic equivalents, COLR / body weight had an area under curve value of 0.814, with sensitivity of 0.781, specificity of 0.773, and a cut-off value of 68.3 mL/min/kg (positive predictive value 0.83; negative predictive value 0.71). Therefore, we conclude that PLRT during hospitalization has a good screening and predictive power for exercise intolerance/capacity in inpatients and early outpatients following coronary revascularization, which has clinical significance.
被动抬腿试验(PLRT)所影响的血流动力学特性反映了心脏泵血效率。在本研究中,我们旨在进一步探究PLRT是否能预测冠状动脉血运重建术后的运动不耐受/运动能力。在冠状动脉搭桥术/经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,120例住院患者在术后住院期间的2 - 12天以及出院后3 - 5周接受了PLRT和心肺运动试验(CPET)。PLRT包括抬头、抬腿和仰卧休息姿势。入院时首次CPET的终点是通气无氧阈,而门诊阶段第二次CPET的终点是最大运动表现。在PLRT期间采用基于生物电抗的无创心输出量监测来测量实时每搏输出量和心输出量。相关矩阵显示,首次PLRT期间抬腿时的每搏输出量(SVLR)与首次CPET期间的无氧阈呈正相关(R = 0.653)。当将运动不耐受定义为无氧阈 < 3代谢当量时,SVLR /体重的曲线下面积值为0.822,灵敏度为0.954,特异性为0.593,截断值为1504·10 - 3mL/kg(阳性预测值0.72;阴性预测值0.92)。此外,首次PLRT期间抬腿时的心输出量(COLR)与第二次CPET期间的峰值耗氧量相关(R = 0.678)。当将有氧运动能力差定义为峰值耗氧量 < 5代谢当量时,COLR /体重的曲线下面积值为0.814,灵敏度为0.781,特异性为0.773,截断值为68.3 mL/min/kg(阳性预测值0.83;阴性预测值0.71)。因此,我们得出结论,住院期间的PLRT对冠状动脉血运重建术后的住院患者和早期门诊患者的运动不耐受/运动能力具有良好的筛查和预测能力,具有临床意义。