Wolinsky Fredric D, Vander Weg Mark W, Howren M Bryant, Jones Michael P, Dotson Megan M
John W. Colloton Chair of Health Management and Policy,College of Public Health,University of Iowa,Iowa City,Iowa,USA.
Investigator,Center for Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation,Iowa City VA HealthCare System,Iowa City,Iowa,USA.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Feb;28(2):317-30. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001428. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
Age-related cognitive decline is common and well-documented. Cognitive speed of processing training (SOPT) has been shown to improve trained abilities (Useful Field of View; UFOV), but transfer to individual non-trained cognitive outcomes or neuropsychological composites is sparse. We examine the effects of SOPT on a composite of six equally weighted tests--UFOV, Trail-making A and B, Symbol Digit Modality, Controlled Oral Word Association, Stroop Color and Word, and Digit Vigilance.
681 patients were randomized separately within two age-bands (50-64, ≥ 65) to three SOPT groups (10 initial hours on-site, 10 initial hours on-site plus 4 hours of boosters, or 10 initial hours at-home) or an attention-control group (10 initial hours on-site of crossword puzzles). At one-year, 587 patients (86.2%) had complete data. A repeated measures linear mixed model was used.
Factor analysis revealed a simple unidimensional structure with Cronbach's α of 0.82. The time effect was statistically significant (p < 0.001; ηp2 = 0.246), but the time by treatment group (p = 0.331), time by age-band (p = 0.463), and time by treatment group by age-band (p = 0.564) effects were not.
Compared to the attention-control group who played a computerized crossword puzzle game, assignment to 10-14 hours of SOPT did not significantly improve a composite measure of cognitive abilities.
与年龄相关的认知衰退很常见且有充分记录。认知加工速度训练(SOPT)已被证明能提高训练后的能力(有用视野;UFOV),但向个体未训练的认知结果或神经心理综合指标的迁移很少。我们研究了SOPT对由六个权重相等的测试组成的综合指标的影响,这些测试包括UFOV、连线测验A和B、符号数字模式测验、受控口语单词联想测验、斯特鲁普颜色和单词测验以及数字警觉性测验。
681名患者在两个年龄组(50 - 64岁,≥65岁)内分别随机分为三个SOPT组(初始10小时现场训练、初始10小时现场训练加4小时强化训练或初始10小时在家训练)或一个注意力控制组(初始10小时现场做填字游戏)。一年后,587名患者(86.2%)有完整数据。使用重复测量线性混合模型。
因子分析揭示了一个简单的单维结构,克朗巴哈系数α为0.82。时间效应具有统计学意义(p < 0.001;偏η² = 0.246),但治疗组与时间的交互作用(p = 0.331)、年龄组与时间的交互作用(p = 0.463)以及治疗组、年龄组与时间的交互作用(p = 0.564)均无统计学意义。
与玩电脑填字游戏的注意力控制组相比,接受10 - 14小时的SOPT训练并未显著改善认知能力的综合指标。