Suppr超能文献

辅助生活和独立生活中的信息处理速度训练:一项随机对照试验。

Speed-of-Processing Training in Assisted and Independent Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

College of Nursing, College of Public Health, University of Iowa.

Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1538-1545. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15423. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine speed-of-processing training (SOPT) in older adults in senior living communities, especially those in assisted living.

DESIGN

Two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Assisted and independent residence settings in 31 senior living communities.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals aged 55 to 102 (mean 81.0, 73.8% female, 76.4% living alone, 47.0% residing in assisted living; N=351).

INTERVENTION

The intervention was 10 hours of computerized SOPT at baseline with 4-hour boosters at 5 and 11 months; the attention control was 10 hours of solving computerized crossword puzzles at baseline with 4-hour boosters at 5 and 11 months.

MEASURES

Outcomes were useful field of view (UFOV) scores and improvements of 0.5 standard deviations (SDs) or more (> 158.4 ms). Data collection occurred at baseline, after training, and 6 and 12 months. Random-effects linear mixed-effect models were used to estimate SOPT effects in intention-to-treat complete-case and multiple imputation analyses.

RESULTS

We found statistically significantly small standardized effect sizes (Cohen's d 0.25-0.40) for SOPT, reflecting processing speed improvements on UFOV scores (of 39-63 ms) and greater percentages (9.8 to 14.9 percentage point advantages) for achieving more than 0.5 SD improvements (> 158.4 ms) over the 3 time periods.

CONCLUSION

These findings support public health messaging about the potential benefits of SOPT for older adults in senior living communities and support the feasibility and acceptability of SOPT in assisted and independent living for older adults.

摘要

目的

研究老年人在高级生活社区,特别是在辅助生活社区中的速度处理训练(SOPT)。

设计

双臂、平行、随机对照试验。

设置

31 个高级生活社区中的辅助和独立居住环境。

参与者

年龄在 55 至 102 岁之间的个体(平均年龄 81.0 岁,73.8%为女性,76.4%独居,47.0%居住在辅助生活中;N=351)。

干预

干预措施是在基线时进行 10 小时的计算机化 SOPT,在 5 个月和 11 个月时进行 4 小时的强化;对照组在基线时进行 10 小时的计算机化填字游戏,在 5 个月和 11 个月时进行 4 小时的强化。

措施

结果是有用视野(UFOV)评分和提高 0.5 个标准差(SD)或更多(>158.4 毫秒)。数据收集在基线、训练后以及 6 个月和 12 个月进行。使用随机效应线性混合效应模型,在意向治疗完全案例和多重插补分析中估计 SOPT 的效果。

结果

我们发现 SOPT 的统计学上显著的小标准化效应大小(Cohen's d 0.25-0.40),反映了 UFOV 评分上的处理速度提高(提高 39-63 毫秒),以及在超过 3 个时间段实现 0.5 SD 以上提高(>158.4 毫秒)的更高百分比(9.8 至 14.9 个百分点优势)。

结论

这些发现支持关于 SOPT 对高级生活社区中老年人潜在益处的公共卫生信息,并支持 SOPT 在老年人辅助和独立生活中的可行性和可接受性。

相似文献

1
Speed-of-Processing Training in Assisted and Independent Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1538-1545. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15423. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
Speed of processing training and depression in assisted and independent living: A randomized controlled trial.
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223841. eCollection 2019.
4
Randomized trial of cognitive speed of processing training in Parkinson disease.
Neurology. 2013 Oct 8;81(15):1284-90. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a823ba. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
10
Computerized Cognitive Training to Improve Mood in Senior Living Settings: Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Open Access J Clin Trials. 2018;10:29-41. doi: 10.2147/OAJCT.S154782. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Computerized Games versus Crosswords Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment.
NEJM Evid. 2022 Dec;1(12). doi: 10.1056/evidoa2200121. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
A Conceptual View of Cognitive Intervention in Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Decline-A Systemic Review.
Front Aging. 2022 Mar 24;3:844725. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2022.844725. eCollection 2022.
5
Speed of processing training and depression in assisted and independent living: A randomized controlled trial.
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 17;14(10):e0223841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223841. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Speed of processing training results in lower risk of dementia.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 Nov 7;3(4):603-611. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.09.002. eCollection 2017 Nov.
2
Systematic review and meta-analyses of useful field of view cognitive training.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Jan;84:72-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
4
Computerized Cognitive Training in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;174(4):329-340. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work?
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016 Oct;17(3):103-186. doi: 10.1177/1529100616661983.
6
Computerized Cognitive Training Is Beneficial for Older Adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Dec;63(12):2610-2612. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13825. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Do cognitive interventions alter the rate of age-related cognitive change?
Intelligence. 2015 Nov-Dec;53:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.09.004.
9
Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers.
PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756. eCollection 2014 Nov.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验