Suppr超能文献

哮喘药物不良反应的种族差异:一项系统评价。

Ethnic differences in adverse drug reactions to asthma medications: a systematic review.

作者信息

Hu Yusun, Cantarero-Arévalo Lourdes

机构信息

a Section for Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2016;53(1):69-75. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1058395. Epub 2015 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information on ethnic diversity of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to asthma medications is rare despite evidence suggesting higher risk for African Americans when using β2-adrenergic receptor agonists. The objectives are to investigate how ethnic background was involved in ADR assessment and to examine the relationship between ethnic background and ADRs to asthma medications.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched until March 2014. All types of studies reporting ADRs to asthma medications involving more than one ethnic group were included. Extracted information includes study designs, ethnic backgrounds, intervention, and types and severities of ADRs.

RESULTS

Among the selected 15 randomised clinical trials, six pooled analyses of randomized clinical trials, and five prospective observational studies, only six studies compared ADRs across different ethnic groups. The majority of the comparisons were either statistically insignificant or inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnicity was largely overlooked. Most studies neglected to report ADRs by ethnicity. Lack of consistency in defining ethnicities complicated further pooled analyses. Despite the higher prevalence of asthma among specific ethnic minority groups, few studies disaggregated information by ethnic background, and reports of ADRs to asthma medications in different ethnic groups were rare. We suggest that the inclusion of ADR analysis by different ethnic backgrounds is desirable.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明非裔美国人使用β2肾上腺素能受体激动剂时发生药物不良反应(ADR)的风险更高,但关于哮喘药物ADR种族差异的信息却很少。目的是调查种族背景在ADR评估中的作用,并研究种族背景与哮喘药物ADR之间的关系。

方法

检索MEDLINE至2014年3月。纳入所有报告涉及多个种族的哮喘药物ADR的各类研究。提取的信息包括研究设计、种族背景、干预措施以及ADR的类型和严重程度。

结果

在选定的15项随机临床试验、6项随机临床试验的汇总分析和5项前瞻性观察性研究中,只有6项研究比较了不同种族之间的ADR。大多数比较在统计学上无显著意义或结论不明确。

结论

种族因素在很大程度上被忽视了。大多数研究忽略按种族报告ADR。种族定义缺乏一致性使进一步的汇总分析变得更加复杂。尽管特定少数族裔群体中哮喘的患病率较高,但很少有研究按种族背景对信息进行分类,不同种族哮喘药物ADR的报告也很少见。我们建议纳入不同种族背景的ADR分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验