Nwosu Benjamin Udoka, Maranda Louise, Cullen Karen, Greenman Lisa, Fleshman Jody, McShea Nancy, Barton Bruce A, Lee Mary M
Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States of America.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue N, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0137525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137525. eCollection 2015.
Insulin resistance has been proposed as one of the causes of poor glycemic control in overweight/obese youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, the role of adjunctive metformin, an insulin sensitizer, on glycemic control in these patients is unclear.
To compare the effect of metformin vs. placebo on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, and other parameters in overweight/obese youth with T1D.
Adjunctive metformin therapy will improve glycemic control in overweight/obese youth with T1D.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A 9-mo randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of metformin and placebo in 28 subjects (13m/15f) of ages 10-20years (y), with HbA1c >8% (64 mmol/mol), BMI >85%, and T1D > 12 months was conducted at a university outpatient facility. The metformin group consisted of 15 subjects (8 m/ 7f), of age 15.0 ± 2.5 y; while the control group was made up of 13 subjects (5m/ 8f), of age 14.5 ± 3.1y. All participants employed a self-directed treat-to-target insulin regimen based on a titration algorithm of (-2)-0-(+2) units to adjust their long-acting insulin dose every 3rd day from -3 mo through +9 mo to maintain fasting plasma glucose (FPG) between 90-120 mg/dL (5.0-6.7 mmol/L). Pubertal maturation was determined by Tanner stage.
Over the course of the 9 months of observation, the between-treatment differences in HbA1c of 0.4% (9.85% [8.82 to 10.88] for placebo versus 9.46% [8.47 to 10.46] for metformin) was not significant (p = 0.903). There were non-significant reduction in fasting plasma glucose (189.4 mg/dL [133.2 to 245.6] for placebo versus 170.5 mg/dL [114.3 to 226.7] for metformin), (p = 0.927); total daily dose (TDD) of short-acting insulin per kg body weight/day(p = 0.936); and the TDD of long-acting insulin per kg body weight per day (1.15 units/kg/day [0.89 to 1.41] for placebo versus 0.90 units/kg/day [0.64 to 1.16] for metformin) (p = 0.221). There was no difference in the occurrence of hypoglycemia between the groups.
This 9-month RCT of adjunctive metformin therapy in overweight and obese youth with T1D resulted in a 0.4% lower HbA1c value in the metformin group compared to the placebo group.
ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01334125.
胰岛素抵抗被认为是超重/肥胖的1型糖尿病(T1D)青少年血糖控制不佳的原因之一。然而,胰岛素增敏剂二甲双胍作为辅助治疗对这些患者血糖控制的作用尚不清楚。
比较二甲双胍与安慰剂对超重/肥胖的T1D青少年糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、胰岛素每日总剂量(TDD)及其他参数的影响。
辅助使用二甲双胍治疗将改善超重/肥胖的T1D青少年的血糖控制。
设计、地点和参与者:在大学门诊机构对28名年龄在10 - 20岁、HbA1c>8%(64 mmol/mol)、BMI>85%且患T1D超过12个月的受试者(13名男性/15名女性)进行了一项为期9个月的二甲双胍与安慰剂随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。二甲双胍组由15名受试者(8名男性/7名女性)组成,年龄为15.0±2.5岁;而对照组由13名受试者(5名男性/8名女性)组成,年龄为14.5±3.1岁。所有参与者采用基于(-2)-0-(+2)单位滴定算法的自我指导的达标胰岛素治疗方案,从-3个月到+9个月每3天调整一次长效胰岛素剂量,以将空腹血糖(FPG)维持在90 - 120 mg/dL(5.0 - 6.7 mmol/L)。青春期成熟度通过 Tanner分期确定。
在9个月的观察期内,治疗组间HbA1c的差异为0.4%(安慰剂组为9.85%[8.82至10.88],二甲双胍组为9.46%[8.47至10.46]),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.903)。空腹血糖无显著降低(安慰剂组为189.4 mg/dL[133.2至245.6],二甲双胍组为170.5 mg/dL[114.3至226.7]),(p = 0.927);每千克体重每天短效胰岛素的每日总剂量(p = 0.936);以及每千克体重每天长效胰岛素的每日总剂量(安慰剂组为1.15单位/千克/天[0.89至1.41],二甲双胍组为0.90单位/千克/天[0.64至1.16])(p = 0.221)。两组间低血糖的发生率无差异。
这项针对超重和肥胖的T1D青少年的二甲双胍辅助治疗的9个月随机对照试验结果显示,与安慰剂组相比,二甲双胍组的HbA1c值低0.4%。
ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01334125。