Clarke Martin, Brown Susan, Völlm Birgit
1 Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Nottingham, UK.
2 University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sex Abuse. 2017 Aug;29(5):446-478. doi: 10.1177/1079063215603691. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting on the effectiveness of Circles of Support and Accountability (Circles). Circles use volunteers to provide support for sex offenders living in the community. We searched 10 databases up to the end of 2013 and identified 3 relevant outcome studies. An additional 12 papers or reports were identified by searching reference lists, Google, and contacting key authors and Circles providers to obtain unpublished data. These 15 studies comprised one randomized controlled trial, three retrospective cohorts with matched controls, and 11 case series. The majority reported measures of recidivism, particularly reconviction. The 4 studies with controls generally reported that participation in Circles was associated with lower recidivism although there were few statistically significant differences. Few studies examined changes in risk or psychosocial outcomes. A number of methodological issues are discussed. Longer term, prospective follow-up studies with control groups are required to address these issues.
我们对报告支持与问责圈(Circles)有效性的研究进行了系统综述。支持与问责圈利用志愿者为居住在社区中的性犯罪者提供支持。截至2013年底,我们检索了10个数据库,确定了3项相关结果研究。通过检索参考文献列表、谷歌,并联系主要作者和支持与问责圈提供者以获取未发表数据,又确定了另外12篇论文或报告。这15项研究包括一项随机对照试验、三项有匹配对照的回顾性队列研究和11个病例系列。大多数研究报告了累犯措施,尤其是再次定罪情况。4项有对照的研究总体上报告称,参与支持与问责圈与较低的累犯率相关,尽管在统计学上几乎没有显著差异。很少有研究考察风险或心理社会结果的变化。文中讨论了一些方法学问题。需要进行长期的、有对照组的前瞻性随访研究来解决这些问题。