Russo Suzanne, Blackstock A William, Herman Joseph M, Abdel-Wahab May, Azad Nilofer, Das Prajnan, Goodman Karyn A, Hong Theodore S, Jabbour Salma K, Jones William E, Konski Andre A, Koong Albert C, Kumar Rachit, Rodriguez-Bigas Miguel, Small William, Thomas Charles R, Suh W Warren
*Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Case Western Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH †Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC ‡Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, American Society of Clinical Oncology §Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH ∥MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, American College of Surgeons ¶Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY #Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA **Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ ††University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX ‡‡The Chester County Hospital, West Chester, PA §§Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA ∥∥Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD ¶¶Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL ##Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR ***Cancer Center of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct;38(5):520-5. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000197.
Low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection are considered standard treatments for early rectal cancer but may be associated with morbidity in selected patients who are candidates for early distal lesions amenable to local excision (LE). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The panel recognizes the importance of accurate staging to identify patients who may be candidates for a LE approach. Patients who may be candidates for LE alone include those with small, low-lying T1 tumors, without adverse pathologic features. Several surgical approaches can be utilized for LE however none include lymph node evaluation. Adjuvant radiation±chemotherapy may be warranted depending on the risk of nodal metastases. Patients with high-risk T1 tumors, T2 tumors not amenable to radical surgery may also benefit from adjuvant treatment; however, patients with positive margins or T3 lesions should be offered abdominoperineal resection or low anterior resection. Neoadjuvant radiation±chemotherapy followed by LE in higher risk patients results in excellent local control, but it is not clear if this approach reduces recurrence rates over surgery alone.
低位前切除术或腹会阴联合切除术被认为是早期直肠癌的标准治疗方法,但对于适合局部切除(LE)的早期远端病变患者,这些手术可能会带来并发症。美国放射学会适宜性标准是针对特定临床情况的循证指南,每3年由多学科专家小组进行审查。指南的制定和审查包括对同行评审期刊上的当前医学文献进行广泛分析,并应用成熟的共识方法(改良德尔菲法)由专家小组对成像和治疗程序的适宜性进行评分。在证据不足或不明确的情况下,可采用专家意见来推荐成像或治疗方法。专家小组认识到准确分期对于识别可能适合LE方法的患者的重要性。仅可能适合LE的患者包括那些患有小的、低位T1肿瘤且无不良病理特征的患者。LE可采用几种手术方法,但均不包括淋巴结评估。根据淋巴结转移风险,可能需要辅助放疗±化疗。高危T1肿瘤、不适合根治性手术的T2肿瘤患者也可能从辅助治疗中获益;然而,切缘阳性或T3病变的患者应接受腹会阴联合切除术或低位前切除术。在高危患者中,新辅助放疗±化疗后行LE可实现良好的局部控制,但尚不清楚这种方法是否比单纯手术降低复发率。