Hata H
Kanagawa Shigaku. 1989 Mar;23(4):587-97.
Recently, many studies have demonstrated the superiority of the ultrasonic devices in endodontic treatment, while other reports did not recognize the advantage of the ultrasonic instrumentation over hand instrumentation. This disagreement in opinion might be due to the fact that the mechanical characteristics of ultrasonic devices have not been clarified. Therefore, some factors which might contribute to the mechanical characteristics of ultrasonic device for root canal treatment were examined. These factors were: (a) applied force on file; (b) angle of connector; (c) position of substrate material being cut; (d) filing speed; and (e) resonance of file. These factors were examined by measuring the cutting depth on acrylic wafer using the cutting efficiency testing apparatus. This apparatus with a push-pull stroke approximately 4 mm in length, was propelled the root canal instruments in linear motion. The filing speed was adjusted to 100 strokes per minute. The results were as follows: 1. The greater load was given to the file, the higher was the cutting ability of ultrasonic device. But cutting efficiency of #15, #25 and #35 files were inhibited over the load of 50, 60 and 70g each. It was considered that the adequate load for filing utilized ultrasonic device was #15:50g, #25:60g and #35:70g. 2. The file attached to the angled connector had a cantilevered vibration. And the cutting ability was effected by connector angle. The 120 degree-type connector was more effective than straight type (180 degree-type connector). 3. Substrate materials were made deeper cut when it was applied against the vibrating direction of the file than were applied at right angle to vibrating direction of the file. 4. Cutting efficacy of ultrasonic device was evaluated under the conditions as filing speed of 25, 50 and 100 strokes/min by comparing each ratio of cutting depth per total number of filing strokes after 20 minutes. The ultrasonic vibration showed tighter cutting ability when this ultrasonic device was operated 25 strokes/min. 5. Cutting efficiency of two methods was examined under the same amplitude. One was to set up the file length slightly shifted from the resonance point and to give the amplitude to file using resonance phenomenon. The other was to set up the file length of nonresonance condition and to give the amplitude by power supplying from the device. The latter showed higher cutting ability without the risk of the file fracture.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
最近,许多研究已证明超声设备在根管治疗中的优越性,而其他报告则未认识到超声器械相对于手动器械的优势。这种观点上的分歧可能是由于超声设备的机械特性尚未阐明。因此,研究了一些可能影响用于根管治疗的超声设备机械特性的因素。这些因素包括:(a)锉上施加的力;(b)连接器角度;(c)被切割基底材料的位置;(d)锉削速度;以及(e)锉的共振。使用切割效率测试装置通过测量丙烯酸晶圆上的切割深度来研究这些因素。该装置的推挽行程约为4毫米,使根管器械做直线运动。锉削速度调整为每分钟100次行程。结果如下:1. 施加在锉上的负载越大,超声设备的切割能力越高。但当#15、#25和#35锉的负载分别超过50克、60克和70克时,其切割效率受到抑制。据认为,使用超声设备进行锉削的合适负载为#15:50克、#25:60克和#35:80克。2. 连接到成角度连接器的锉具有悬臂振动。并且切割能力受连接器角度影响。120度型连接器比直型(180度型连接器)更有效。3. 当基底材料与锉的振动方向相反施加时,比与锉的振动方向成直角施加时切割更深。4. 通过比较20分钟后每次锉削行程的切割深度与总锉削行程的比例,在锉削速度为25、50和100次/分钟的条件下评估超声设备的切割效果。当该超声设备以25次/分钟运行时,超声振动显示出更强的切割能力。5. 在相同振幅下检查了两种方法的切割效率。一种是将锉的长度设置为略偏离共振点,并利用共振现象给锉施加振幅。另一种是将锉设置在非共振状态下的长度,并通过设备供电施加振幅。后者显示出更高的切割能力且没有锉折断的风险。(摘要截选至400字)