D'Onofrio Mirko, De Robertis Riccardo, Barbi Emilio, Martone Enrico, Manfrin Erminia, Gobbo Stefano, Puntel Gino, Bonetti Franco, Pozzi Mucelli Roberto
Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi Hospital, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
Department of Radiology, Casa di cura Pederzoli, Peschiera del Garda, Italy.
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun;26(6):1801-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4003-x. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) of solid pancreatic neoplasms through the analysis of 10-year experiences of two centres.
Clinical, radiological and pathologic data of 2,024 patients with solid pancreatic masses who underwent US-FNAs were retrospectively evaluated. Indications for aspiration were: unresectable lesions before neo-adjuvant therapy; doubtful imaging findings; and suspicion of uncommon neoplasms with prognostic or therapeutic implications such as metastases or lymphoma. US-FNAs were performed using aspiration needles with a cytopathologist present in centre 1. In centre 2, cytologic samples were collected with Chiba needles and separately evaluated by a cytopathologist.
US-FNA had a diagnostic sample rate of 92.2 % (centre 1: 95.9 %; centre 2: 87.2 %). US-FNA repetition after non-diagnostic samples provided a diagnosis in 86.3 % of cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were 98.7 %, 100 %, 100 %, 75.5 %, and 98.7 %, respectively. The complication rate was 0.8 %.
Percutaneous US-FNA is a sensitive, accurate and safe method for the invasive diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms. The use of aspiration needles and the on-site presence of a cytopathologist may lead to a high rate of diagnostic samples, thus reducing the need for US-FNA repetition.
• Percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic neoplasms is sensitive and accurate. • The short-term complication rate of percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is low. • Technical aspects may influence the rate of diagnostic samples.
通过分析两个中心10年的经验,评估经皮超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(US-FNA)对实性胰腺肿瘤的诊断准确性及并发症发生率。
对2024例接受US-FNA的实性胰腺肿块患者的临床、放射学及病理数据进行回顾性评估。穿刺抽吸的适应证为:新辅助治疗前不可切除的病变;影像学表现可疑;怀疑为具有预后或治疗意义的罕见肿瘤,如转移瘤或淋巴瘤。在中心1,由细胞病理学家在场,使用抽吸针进行US-FNA。在中心2,用千叶针采集细胞学样本,并由细胞病理学家单独评估。
US-FNA的诊断样本率为92.2%(中心1:95.9%;中心2:87.2%)。非诊断性样本后重复US-FNA在86.3%的病例中得出诊断结果。敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值及准确性分别为98.7%、100%、100%、75.5%和98.7%。并发症发生率为0.8%。
经皮US-FNA是一种用于实性胰腺肿瘤侵入性诊断的敏感、准确且安全的方法。使用抽吸针及细胞病理学家现场操作可能会提高诊断样本率,从而减少重复US-FNA的必要性。
• 经皮超声引导下胰腺肿瘤细针穿刺抽吸术敏感且准确。• 经皮超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术的短期并发症发生率低。• 技术因素可能影响诊断样本率。