Suppr超能文献

直肠癌术前放化疗:静脉注射 5-氟尿嘧啶与口服卡培他滨的比较。

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a comparison between intravenous 5-fluorouracil and oral capecitabine.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology, Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Bebington, Wirral, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2010 Aug;12 Suppl 2:37-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02323.x.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine provides an attractive alternative to intravenous (IV) 5-flourouracil (5-FU) in chemoradiation regimes for rectal cancer by avoiding the need for intravenous access and inpatient stay. We aimed to compare retrospectively the efficacy of concurrent capecitabine with IV 5-FU in preoperative pelvic chemoradiation schedules for rectal cancer in our centre.

METHOD

Patients treated from January 2005 to June 2007 were included. Information was collected on patient characteristics; treatment details; pathological response to treatment; recurrence and survival. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS V17.

RESULTS

All patients had pelvic radiation. Ninety-nine patients were treated with capecitabine and 97 with 5-FU. The two groups were well matched for age, sex and TNM stage. There were significantly more PS (performance status) 0 patients in the capecitabine group (51%vs 30%) (P = 0.001). Of the 99 patients in the capecitabine group, 91 (92%) were able to undergo surgery with 84 (93%) achieving R0 resection. In the 5-FU group, these proportions were 87 (90%) and 70 (80%). The difference in the rate of R0 resection was statistically significant (P = 0.024). The APR rate was 35% in the capecitabine group compared with 47% in the 5-FU group (P = 0.06). There was no significant difference in pathological complete response (pCR) rates between capecitabine (14%) and 5-FU(12%). A higher pCR rate (30%) was observed in patients who underwent a brachytherapy boost (P = 0.051). There were three local recurrences in the whole patient group, (capecitabine 1; 5-FU 2). Thirty-five patients had distant metastases, 14 in the capecitabine and 21 in the 5-FU group. There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence between the two groups. Six patients in each group had grade 3 toxicity with diarrhoea being more common with capecitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for rectal cancer is efficacious and comparable to 5-FU (IV). It is more convenient, is well tolerated and avoids the need for inpatient admission.

摘要

介绍

卡培他滨在直肠癌的放化疗方案中,通过避免静脉通路和住院治疗,为静脉注射(IV)5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)提供了一种有吸引力的替代方案。我们旨在比较本中心直肠癌术前盆腔放化疗方案中卡培他滨与 IV 5-FU 的疗效。

方法

纳入 2005 年 1 月至 2007 年 6 月期间治疗的患者。收集患者特征、治疗细节、治疗的病理反应、复发和生存信息。所有统计分析均使用 SPSS V17 进行。

结果

所有患者均接受盆腔放疗。99 例患者接受卡培他滨治疗,97 例患者接受 5-FU 治疗。两组患者在年龄、性别和 TNM 分期方面匹配良好。卡培他滨组 PS(表现状态)0 患者明显更多(51%比 30%)(P=0.001)。卡培他滨组 99 例患者中,91 例(92%)能够接受手术,84 例(93%)实现 R0 切除。5-FU 组中,这些比例分别为 87(90%)和 70(80%)。R0 切除率的差异具有统计学意义(P=0.024)。卡培他滨组的 APR 率为 35%,5-FU 组为 47%(P=0.06)。卡培他滨组和 5-FU 组的病理完全缓解(pCR)率无显著差异(卡培他滨组 14%,5-FU 组 12%)。接受近距离放疗加量的患者 pCR 率更高(30%)(P=0.051)。整个患者组中有 3 例局部复发,卡培他滨组 1 例,5-FU 组 2 例。35 例患者发生远处转移,卡培他滨组 14 例,5-FU 组 21 例。两组复发风险无显著差异。卡培他滨组和 5-FU 组各有 6 例患者出现 3 级毒性,腹泻更常见于卡培他滨组。

结论

卡培他滨用于直肠癌的术前放化疗是有效且与 5-FU(IV)相当的。它更方便,耐受性更好,并且避免了住院治疗的需要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验