Suppr超能文献

妇女组织改善母婴健康结局:实现规模化影响的不同证据范式。

Women's Groups to Improve Maternal and Child Health Outcomes: Different Evidence Paradigms Toward Impact at Scale.

出版信息

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Sep 15;3(3):323-6. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00251. Print 2015 Sep.

Abstract

The Care Group model, with relatively intensive international NGO implementation at moderate scale, appears successful in a wide variety of settings, as assessed by high-quality evaluation with rich program learning. Another women’s group approach—Participatory Women’s Groups—has also been implemented across various settings but at smaller scale and assessed using rigorous RCT methodology under controlled—but less naturalistic—conditions with generally, although not uniformly, positive results. Neither approach, as implemented to date, is directly applicable to large-scale integration into current public programs. Our challenge is to distill the elements of success across these approaches that empower women with knowledge, motivation, and increased self-efficacy—and to apply them in real-world programs at scale.

摘要

关怀小组模式在适度规模上相对密集地实施国际非政府组织,在各种环境中似乎取得了成功,这一点得到了高质量评估和丰富的项目学习的证明。另一种妇女团体方法——参与式妇女团体——也在各种环境中实施,但规模较小,在控制条件下但不太自然的情况下使用严格的随机对照试验方法进行评估,结果通常是积极的,但并非一致。迄今为止,这两种方法都不能直接适用于大规模纳入当前公共方案。我们面临的挑战是从这些方法中提炼出使妇女获得知识、动力和增强自我效能的成功要素,并将其应用于实际的大规模项目中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be55/4570005/ec1ca26b0b25/323fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验