Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60685-6.
Maternal and neonatal mortality rates remain high in many low-income and middle-income countries. Different approaches for the improvement of birth outcomes have been used in community-based interventions, with heterogeneous effects on survival. We assessed the effects of women's groups practising participatory learning and action, compared with usual care, on birth outcomes in low-resource settings.
We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials undertaken in Bangladesh, India, Malawi, and Nepal in which the effects of women's groups practising participatory learning and action were assessed to identify population-level predictors of effect on maternal mortality, neonatal mortality, and stillbirths. We also reviewed the cost-effectiveness of the women's group intervention and estimated its potential effect at scale in Countdown countries.
Seven trials (119,428 births) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses of all trials showed that exposure to women's groups was associated with a 37% reduction in maternal mortality (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.32-0.94), a 23% reduction in neonatal mortality (0.77, 0.65-0.90), and a 9% non-significant reduction in stillbirths (0.91, 0.79-1.03), with high heterogeneity for maternal (I(2)=58.8%, p=0.024) and neonatal results (I(2)=64.7%, p=0.009). In the meta-regression analyses, the proportion of pregnant women in groups was linearly associated with reduction in both maternal and neonatal mortality (p=0.026 and p=0.011, respectively). A subgroup analysis of the four studies in which at least 30% of pregnant women participated in groups showed a 55% reduction in maternal mortality (0.45, 0.17-0.73) and a 33% reduction in neonatal mortality (0.67, 0.59-0.74). The intervention was cost effective by WHO standards and could save an estimated 283,000 newborn infants and 41,100 mothers per year if implemented in rural areas of 74 Countdown countries.
With the participation of at least a third of pregnant women and adequate population coverage, women's groups practising participatory learning and action are a cost-effective strategy to improve maternal and neonatal survival in low-resource settings.
Wellcome Trust, Ammalife, and National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for Birmingham and the Black Country programme.
在许多低收入和中等收入国家,母婴死亡率仍然很高。社区为基础的干预措施采用了不同的方法来改善生育结果,但对生存率的影响存在差异。我们评估了妇女团体参与式学习和行动与常规护理相比,对资源匮乏环境中的生育结果的影响。
我们对在孟加拉国、印度、马拉维和尼泊尔进行的随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,评估了妇女团体参与式学习和行动的效果,以确定对孕产妇死亡率、新生儿死亡率和死产有影响的人群水平预测因素。我们还审查了妇女团体干预措施的成本效益,并估计了在倒计时国家大规模实施的潜在效果。
有 7 项试验(119428 例分娩)符合纳入标准。所有试验的荟萃分析显示,接触妇女团体与孕产妇死亡率降低 37%(比值比 0.63,95%CI 0.32-0.94)、新生儿死亡率降低 23%(0.77,0.65-0.90)和死产率降低 9%(无统计学意义)(0.91,0.79-1.03)有关,孕产妇结果(I²=58.8%,p=0.024)和新生儿结果(I²=64.7%,p=0.009)的异质性很高。在回归分析中,妇女团体中孕妇的比例与孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的降低呈线性相关(p=0.026 和 p=0.011)。在至少 30%的孕妇参加团体的四项研究的亚组分析中,孕产妇死亡率降低了 55%(0.45,0.17-0.73),新生儿死亡率降低了 33%(0.67,0.59-0.74)。按照世卫组织的标准,该干预措施具有成本效益,如果在 74 个倒计时国家的农村地区实施,估计每年可挽救 283000 名新生儿和 41100 名母亲。
在至少三分之一的孕妇参与和足够的人口覆盖的情况下,妇女团体参与式学习和行动是一种具有成本效益的策略,可以提高资源匮乏环境中的母婴生存。
惠康信托基金会、Ammalife 和英国国民健康保险制度(NHS)与伯明翰及黑区合作研究与护理领导协会合作开展了应用健康研究和护理的领导力项目。