Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, New York, NY, USA
Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, New York, NY, USA.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2015 Sep 15;3(3):482-502. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00034. Print 2015 Sep.
Growing international concern about the need for improved health systems in Africa has catalyzed an expansion of the health systems literature. This review applies a bibliometric procedure to analyze the acceleration of scientific writing on this theme. We focus on research published during the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) era between 1990 and 2014, reporting findings from a systematic review of a database comprised of 17,655 articles about health systems themes from sub-Saharan African countries or subregions. Using bibliometric tools for co-word textual analysis, we analyzed the incidence and associations of keywords and phrases to generate and visualize topical foci on health systems as clusters of themes, much in the manner that astronomers represent groupings of stars as galaxies of celestial entities. The association of keywords defines their relative position, with the size of images weighted by the relative frequency of terms. Sets of associated keywords are arrayed as stars that cluster as "galaxies" of concepts in the knowledge universe represented by health systems research from sub-Saharan Africa. Results show that health systems research is dominated by literature on diseases and categorical systems research topics, rather than on systems science that cuts across diseases or specific systemic themes. Systems research is highly developed in South Africa but relatively uncommon elsewhere in the region. "Black holes" are identified by searching for terms in our keyword library related to terms in widely cited reviews of health systems. Results identify several themes that are unexpectedly uncommon in the country-specific health systems literature. This includes research on the processes of achieving systems change, the health impact of systems strengthening, processes that explain the systems determinants of health outcomes, or systematic study of organizational dysfunction and ways to improve system performance. Research quantifying the relationship of governance indicators to health systems strengthening is nearly absent from the literature. Long-term experimental studies and statistically rigorous research on cross-cutting themes of health systems strengthening are rare. Studies of organizational malaise or corruption are virtually absent. Trend analysis shows the emergence of organizational research on specific priority diseases, such as on HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis, but portrays a lack of focus on integrated systems research on the general burden of disease. If health systems in Africa are to be strengthened, then organizational change research must be a more concerted focus in the future than has been the case in the past.
对改善非洲卫生系统的必要性日益引起国际关注,这促使卫生系统文献大量增加。本研究运用文献计量学方法分析了这一主题科学著述的加速增长。我们关注的是 1990 年至 2014 年千年发展目标时代发表的研究,报告了对一个由来自撒哈拉以南非洲国家或次区域的卫生系统主题的 17655 篇文章的系统综述的发现。我们使用共词文本分析的文献计量工具,分析了关键词和短语的出现频率及其关联,以便生成和可视化卫生系统的主题焦点,并将其作为主题集群,以类似于天文学家将恒星分组为星系的方式来表示天体实体的星系。关键词的关联定义了它们的相对位置,图像的大小由术语的相对频率加权。相关关键词集排列为恒星,它们在以撒哈拉以南非洲卫生系统研究为代表的知识宇宙的概念星系中聚类。结果表明,卫生系统研究主要以疾病和分类系统研究主题的文献为基础,而不是以跨越疾病或特定系统主题的系统科学为基础。南非的系统研究非常发达,但该地区其他地方则相对较少。通过在我们的关键词库中搜索与广泛引用的卫生系统综述相关的术语,来查找“黑洞”。结果确定了一些在特定国家的卫生系统文献中不常见的主题。这包括实现系统变革的过程、系统强化对健康的影响、解释卫生结果系统决定因素的过程,或对组织功能障碍及其改进系统绩效的方式进行系统研究。量化治理指标与卫生系统强化关系的研究在文献中几乎不存在。关于卫生系统强化的跨领域主题的长期实验研究和严格的统计研究非常罕见。关于组织失调或腐败的研究几乎没有。趋势分析表明,针对特定优先疾病(如艾滋病毒/艾滋病、疟疾和结核病)的组织研究已经出现,但却缺乏对一般疾病负担的综合系统研究的关注。如果要加强非洲的卫生系统,那么组织变革研究必须成为未来比过去更集中的重点。