Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Aug 8;11:30. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-30.
Attention is increasingly directed to bridging the gap between the production of knowledge and its use for health decision-making in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). An important and underdeveloped area of health policy and systems research (HPSR) is the organization of this process. Drawing from an interdisciplinary conception of embeddedness, a literature review was conducted to identify examples of embedded HPSR used to inform decision-making in LMICs. The results of the literature review were organized according to the World Health Organization's Building Blocks Framework. Next, a conceptual model was created to illustrate the arrangement of organizations that produce embedded HPSR and the characteristics that facilitate its uptake into the arena of decision-making. We found that multiple forces converge to create context-specific pathways through which evidence enters into decision-making. Depending on the decision under consideration, the literature indicates that decision-makers may call upon an intricate combination of actors for sourcing HPSR. While proximity to decision-making does have advantages, it is not the position of the organization within the network, but rather the qualities the organization possesses, that enable it to be embedded. Our findings suggest that four qualities influence embeddedness: reputation, capacity, quality of connections to decision-makers, and quantity of connections to decision-makers and others. In addition to this, the policy environment (e.g. the presence of legislation governing the use of HPSR, presence of strong civil society, etc.) strongly influences uptake. Through this conceptual model, we can understand which conditions are likely to enhance uptake of HPSR in LMIC health systems. This raises several important considerations for decision-makers and researchers about the arrangement and interaction of evidence-generating organizations in health systems.
人们越来越关注弥合知识生产与中低收入国家(LMICs)卫生决策之间的差距。卫生政策和体系研究(HPSR)的一个重要且尚未得到充分发展的领域是该过程的组织。本文从嵌入性的跨学科概念出发,进行了文献综述,以确定用于为 LMIC 中的决策提供信息的嵌入式 HPSR 的示例。文献综述的结果根据世界卫生组织的构建模块框架进行了组织。接下来,创建了一个概念模型来说明生产嵌入式 HPSR 的组织的安排以及促进其纳入决策领域的特征。我们发现,多种力量汇聚在一起,为证据进入决策制定创造了特定于情境的途径。根据正在考虑的决策,文献表明决策者可能会根据具体情况从众多参与者中获取 HPSR。虽然接近决策制定具有优势,但组织在网络中的位置并不是关键,而是组织所拥有的特质使其能够嵌入。我们的研究结果表明,有四个因素会影响嵌入性:声誉、能力、与决策者的联系质量,以及与决策者和其他人的联系数量。除此之外,政策环境(例如,管理 HPSR 使用的立法的存在、强大的公民社会等)也会强烈影响采用率。通过这个概念模型,我们可以了解哪些条件更有可能促进 LMIC 卫生系统中 HPSR 的采用。这为决策者和研究人员提供了有关卫生系统中证据产生组织的安排和相互作用的一些重要考虑因素。