Tugut Faik, Coskun Mehmet Emre, Dogan Derya Ozdemir, Kirmali Omer, Akin Hakan
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
J Prosthodont. 2016 Jun;25(4):319-23. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12296. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
The bond strength of soft denture liner to a recently introduced denture base resin after thermocycling has not been compared to traditional denture base materials. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of thermocycling on the tensile bond strength of soft denture liners to two chemically different denture base resins, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA).
A total of 48 PMMA and UDMA tensile test specimens were fabricated by attaching two different soft denture liners (Molloplast-B, Permaflex) according to the manufacturers' instructions and assigned to two groups. Half of the specimens for each group were stored in water for 1 week, and the other half were thermocycled (5000 cycles) between baths of 5°C and 55°C. Specimens were mounted on a universal testing machine with a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons tests (α = 0.05).
The highest bond strength was measured in the specimens from the UDMA/Molloplast groups, and the lowest was seen in the PMMA/Permaflex group. No significant difference in bond strength was detected in PMMA/Permaflex groups after thermocycling (p = 0.082), whereas other groups exhibited significant differences after thermocycling (p < 0.05).
Thermocycling decreased the bond strength values in both the PMMA and UDMA groups. Regardless of types of soft liners, PMMA specimens presented lower bond strength values than UDMA specimens, both before and after thermocycling.
热循环后,新型义齿基托树脂与软质义齿衬垫之间的粘结强度尚未与传统义齿基托材料进行比较。本研究的目的是探讨热循环对两种化学性质不同的义齿基托树脂——聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和聚氨酯二甲基丙烯酸酯(UDMA)与软质义齿衬垫拉伸粘结强度的影响。
根据制造商的说明,通过粘贴两种不同的软质义齿衬垫(Molloplast - B、Permaflex)制作了总共48个PMMA和UDMA拉伸测试样本,并分为两组。每组样本的一半在水中储存1周,另一半在5°C和55°C的水浴之间进行热循环(5000次循环)。样本以5 mm/min的十字头速度安装在万能试验机上。数据采用三因素方差分析和事后Tukey - Kramer多重比较检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。
UDMA/Molloplast组样本的粘结强度最高,而PMMA/Permaflex组的粘结强度最低。热循环后,PMMA/Permaflex组的粘结强度无显著差异(p = 0.082),而其他组在热循环后表现出显著差异(p < 0.05)。
热循环降低了PMMA组和UDMA组的粘结强度值。无论软衬垫类型如何,热循环前后,PMMA样本的粘结强度值均低于UDMA样本。