Lecturer, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Graduate student, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov;120(5):699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.032. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
Levels of bond strength between different types of resilient denture liner materials bonded to different denture base acrylic resins, CAD-CAM acrylic resins in particular, have not been well reported.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure the tensile bond strength and durability of various combinations of 3 different resilient denture liners bonded to 3 different poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base materials.
The tensile bond strength of 3 resilient denture liners, namely Ufi Gel SC, Silagum-Comfort, and Vertex Soft, combined with heat-polymerized (Vertex Rapid Simplified), autopolymerized (Vertex Self-Curing), and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) (IvoBase CAD) denture base resins were tested by using a universal testing machine (total N=138). Half of the specimens were thermocycled between 5°C and 55°C for 1500 cycles before testing. After testing, modes of failure and interface surfaces were examined using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out to analyze the differences in content between the 3 different denture base acrylic resins.
The mean tensile bond strength values ranged from 0.36 ±0.1 MPa to 1.51 ±0.46 MPa. CAD-CAM denture base materials showed the lowest range of bond strength when coupled to resilient denture liners (0.36 to 0.42 MPa). No statistically significant differences (P=.74) were found in bond strength between the thermocycled (0.71 ±0.23 MPa) and non-thermocycled groups (0.74 ±0.21 MPa). Silicone-based resilient denture liners exhibited the highest tensile strength with each type of denture resin. All 3 types of failure modes (adhesive, cohesive, and mixed modes) were observed.
Silicone-based resilient denture liners produced the highest tensile bond strength to all denture bases tested. Resilient denture liners bonded to CAD-CAM denture bases produced the weakest tensile bond strengths. Thermocycling did not produce statistically significant differences in tensile bond strength of the resilient denture liners to the denture base resins.
不同类型的弹性义齿衬垫材料与不同义齿基托树脂(尤其是 CAD-CAM 丙烯酸树脂)之间的粘结强度水平尚未得到很好的报道。
本体外研究的目的是测量三种不同弹性义齿衬垫材料与三种不同聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯义齿基托材料组合的拉伸粘结强度和耐久性。
使用万能试验机(共 138 个样本)测试三种弹性义齿衬垫材料,即 Ufi Gel SC、Silagum-Comfort 和 Vertex Soft,与热聚合(Vertex Rapid Simplified)、自聚合(Vertex Self-Curing)和计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)(IvoBase CAD)义齿基托树脂的拉伸粘结强度。一半的样本在测试前进行了 1500 次 5°C 至 55°C 的热循环。测试后,用光显微镜和扫描电子显微镜分别检查失效模式和界面表面。进行热重分析以分析三种不同义齿基托丙烯酸树脂之间的含量差异。
平均拉伸粘结强度值范围为 0.36 ±0.1 MPa 至 1.51 ±0.46 MPa。CAD-CAM 义齿基托材料与弹性义齿衬垫结合时显示出最低的粘结强度范围(0.36 至 0.42 MPa)。热循环组(0.71 ±0.23 MPa)和非热循环组(0.74 ±0.21 MPa)之间的粘结强度无统计学差异(P=.74)。硅基弹性义齿衬垫与每种义齿树脂结合时均显示出最高的拉伸强度。观察到所有三种失效模式(粘结、内聚和混合模式)。
硅基弹性义齿衬垫与所有测试的义齿基托均产生最高的拉伸粘结强度。弹性义齿衬垫与 CAD-CAM 义齿基托结合时产生的拉伸粘结强度最弱。热循环对弹性义齿衬垫与义齿基托树脂之间的拉伸粘结强度无统计学显著差异。