Marneweck Michelle, Knelange Elisabeth, Lee-Miller Trevor, Santello Marco, Gordon Andrew M
Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
MOVE Research Institute, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16;10(9):e0138258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138258. eCollection 2015.
Studies have shown that internal representations of manipulations of objects with asymmetric mass distributions that are generated within a specific orientation are not generalizable to novel orientations, i.e., subjects fail to prevent object roll on their first grasp-lift attempt of the object following 180° object rotation. This suggests that representations of these manipulations are specific to the reference frame in which they are formed. However, it is unknown whether that reference frame is specific to the hand, the body, or both, because rotating the object 180° modifies the relation between object and body as well as object and hand. An alternative, untested explanation for the above failure to generalize learned manipulations is that any rotation will disrupt grasp performance, regardless if the reference frame in which the manipulation was learned is maintained or modified. We examined the effect of rotations that (1) maintain and (2) modify relations between object and body, and object and hand, on the generalizability of learned two-digit manipulation of an object with an asymmetric mass distribution. Following rotations that maintained the relation between object and body and object and hand (e.g., rotating the object and subject 180°), subjects continued to use appropriate digit placement and load force distributions, thus generating sufficient compensatory moments to minimize object roll. In contrast, following rotations that modified the relation between (1) object and hand (e.g. rotating the hand around to the opposite object side), (2) object and body (e.g. rotating subject and hand 180°), or (3) both (e.g. rotating the subject 180°), subjects used the same, yet inappropriate digit placement and load force distribution, as those used prior to the rotation. Consequently, the compensatory moments were insufficient to prevent large object rolls. These findings suggest that representations of learned manipulation of objects with asymmetric mass distributions are specific to the body- and hand-reference frames in which they were learned.
研究表明,在特定方向上生成的、对具有不对称质量分布的物体进行操作的内部表征,无法推广到新的方向,即,在物体旋转180°后,受试者在首次抓握提起该物体时无法防止物体滚动。这表明这些操作的表征特定于其形成时的参考系。然而,尚不清楚该参考系是特定于手、身体,还是两者都有,因为将物体旋转180°会改变物体与身体以及物体与手之间的关系。对于上述学习到的操作无法推广的情况,另一种未经检验的解释是,任何旋转都会干扰抓握表现,无论学习操作时的参考系是保持不变还是发生了改变。我们研究了以下两种旋转的影响:(1)保持以及(2)改变物体与身体、物体与手之间的关系,对学习到的对具有不对称质量分布的物体进行两位数操作的可推广性的影响。在保持物体与身体以及物体与手之间关系的旋转之后(例如,将物体和受试者旋转180°),受试者继续使用适当的手指放置和负载力分布,从而产生足够的补偿力矩以最小化物体滚动。相比之下,在改变了(1)物体与手之间的关系(例如,将手旋转到物体的另一侧)、(2)物体与身体之间的关系(例如,将受试者和手旋转180°)或(3)两者都改变(例如,将受试者旋转180°)的旋转之后,受试者使用与旋转前相同但不适当的手指放置和负载力分布。因此,补偿力矩不足以防止物体大幅滚动。这些发现表明,对具有不对称质量分布的物体进行学习操作的表征特定于学习这些操作时的身体和手的参考系。