Michelle Marneweck, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia Scott Grafton, and.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106
J Neurosci. 2020 Mar 25;40(13):2708-2716. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2791-19.2020. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
The ability of humans to reach and grasp objects in their environment has been the mainstay paradigm for characterizing the neural circuitry driving object-centric actions. Although much is known about hand shaping, a persistent question is how the brain orchestrates and integrates the grasp with lift forces of the fingers in a coordinated manner. The objective of the current study was to investigate how the brain represents grasp configuration and lift force during a dexterous object-centric action in a large sample of male and female human subjects. BOLD activity was measured as subjects used a precision-grasp to lift an object with a center of mass (CoM) on the left or right with the goal of minimizing tilting the object. The extent to which grasp configuration and lift force varied between left and right CoM conditions was manipulated by grasping the object collinearly (requiring a non-collinear force distribution) or non-collinearly (requiring more symmetrical forces). Bayesian variational representational similarity analyses on fMRI data assessed the evidence that a set of cortical and cerebellar regions were sensitive to grasp configuration or lift force differences between CoM conditions at differing time points during a grasp to lift action. In doing so, we reveal strong evidence that grasping and lift force are not represented by spatially separate functionally specialized regions, but by the same regions at differing time points. The coordinated grasp to lift effort is shown to be under dorsolateral (PMv and AIP) more than dorsomedial control, and under SPL7, somatosensory PSC, ventral LOC and cerebellar control. Clumsy disasters such as spilling, dropping, and crushing during our daily interactions with objects are a rarity rather than the norm. These disasters are avoided in part as a result of our orchestrated anticipatory efforts to integrate and coordinate grasping and lifting of object interactions, all before the lift of an object even commences. How the brain orchestrates this integration process has been largely neglected by historical approaches independently and solely focusing on reaching and grasping and the neural principles that guide them. Here, we test the extent to which grasping and lifting are represented in a spatially or temporally distinct manner and identified strong evidence for the consecutive emergence of sensitivity to grasping, then lifting within the same region.
人类在环境中伸手抓取物体的能力一直是描述以物体为中心的动作的神经回路的主要范例。尽管对手的形状有了很多了解,但一个持续存在的问题是大脑如何协调并整合手指的抓握力和提升力,使其协调一致。本研究的目的是在大量男性和女性人类受试者中,调查大脑在灵巧的以物体为中心的动作中如何表示抓握配置和提升力。当受试者使用精确抓握力以最小化物体倾斜的方式用左或右的质心 (CoM) 抬起物体时,测量了 BOLD 活动。通过以共线(需要非共线力分布)或非共线(需要更对称的力)方式抓取物体,来操纵抓握配置和提升力在左和右 CoM 条件之间的变化程度。对 fMRI 数据进行贝叶斯变分代表性相似性分析,评估了在抓握到提升动作的不同时间点,一组皮质和小脑区域对 CoM 条件下的抓握配置或提升力差异敏感的证据。通过这样做,我们有力地证明了抓握和提升力不是由空间上分离的功能专业化区域表示的,而是由在不同时间点的相同区域表示的。协调的抓握和提升力被证明主要受背外侧(PMv 和 AIP)控制,而不是背内侧控制,受 SPL7、体感 PSC、腹侧 LOC 和小脑控制。在我们与物体日常互动中,像溢出、掉落和压碎这样的笨拙灾难很少发生,而是很罕见。这些灾难之所以能够避免,部分原因是我们在物体提升之前就协调了预期努力,以整合和协调抓握和提升物体的相互作用。大脑如何协调这个整合过程在很大程度上被历史方法所忽视,这些方法独立地、仅仅专注于伸手和抓握,以及指导它们的神经原则。在这里,我们测试了抓握和提升在空间或时间上以不同方式表示的程度,并确定了强有力的证据,证明在同一区域内对抓握的敏感性先于提升而出现。