Suppr超能文献

药物研发中生物标志物多重配体结合分析的使用建议及适用性验证

Recommendations for Use and Fit-for-Purpose Validation of Biomarker Multiplex Ligand Binding Assays in Drug Development.

作者信息

Jani Darshana, Allinson John, Berisha Flora, Cowan Kyra J, Devanarayan Viswanath, Gleason Carol, Jeromin Andreas, Keller Steve, Khan Masood U, Nowatzke Bill, Rhyne Paul, Stephen Laurie

机构信息

Pfizer Inc., One Burtt Road, Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, USA.

LGC Ltd, Newmarket Road, Fordham, Cambridgeshire, CB7 5WW, UK.

出版信息

AAPS J. 2016 Jan;18(1):1-14. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9820-y. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

Abstract

Multiplex ligand binding assays (LBAs) are increasingly being used to support many stages of drug development. The complexity of multiplex assays creates many unique challenges in comparison to single-plexed assays leading to various adjustments for validation and potentially during sample analysis to accommodate all of the analytes being measured. This often requires a compromise in decision making with respect to choosing final assay conditions and acceptance criteria of some key assay parameters, depending on the intended use of the assay. The critical parameters that are impacted due to the added challenges associated with multiplexing include the minimum required dilution (MRD), quality control samples that span the range of all analytes being measured, quantitative ranges which can be compromised for certain targets, achieving parallelism for all analytes of interest, cross-talk across assays, freeze-thaw stability across analytes, among many others. Thus, these challenges also increase the complexity of validating the performance of the assay for its intended use. This paper describes the challenges encountered with multiplex LBAs, discusses the underlying causes, and provides solutions to help overcome these challenges. Finally, we provide recommendations on how to perform a fit-for-purpose-based validation, emphasizing issues that are unique to multiplex kit assays.

摘要

多重配体结合分析(LBAs)越来越多地用于支持药物开发的多个阶段。与单重分析相比,多重分析的复杂性带来了许多独特的挑战,这导致在验证过程中以及可能在样品分析过程中需要进行各种调整,以适应所有被测量的分析物。这通常需要在选择最终分析条件和某些关键分析参数的验收标准方面进行权衡,具体取决于分析的预期用途。由于多重分析带来的额外挑战而受到影响的关键参数包括最低所需稀释度(MRD)、涵盖所有被测量分析物范围的质量控制样品、可能因某些目标而受到影响的定量范围、实现所有感兴趣分析物的平行性、分析之间的串扰、分析物之间的冻融稳定性等等。因此,这些挑战也增加了验证分析用于其预期用途时性能的复杂性。本文描述了多重LBA遇到的挑战,讨论了潜在原因,并提供了有助于克服这些挑战的解决方案。最后,我们提供了关于如何进行基于目的适用性验证的建议,强调了多重试剂盒分析特有的问题。

相似文献

2
A condensed performance-validation strategy for multiplex detection kits used in studies of human clinical samples.
J Immunol Methods. 2013 Jan 31;387(1-2):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
3
Analytical performance of a commercial multiplex Luminex-based cytokine panel in the rat.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2018 May-Jun;91:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Validation of immunoassay for protein biomarkers: bioanalytical study plan implementation to support pre-clinical and clinical studies.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011 Jul 15;55(5):869-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.03.033. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
6
Recommendations for classification of commercial LBA kits for biomarkers in drug development from the GCC for bioanalysis.
Bioanalysis. 2019 Apr;11(7):645-653. doi: 10.4155/bio-2019-0072. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
8
Quantitative validation and comparison of multiplex cytokine kits.
J Biomol Screen. 2010 Jun;15(5):562-8. doi: 10.1177/1087057110362099. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
9
Method validation of protein biomarkers in support of drug development or clinical diagnosis/prognosis.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009 May 1;877(13):1259-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.11.022. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
Biomarker Assay Validation by Mass Spectrometry.
AAPS J. 2022 May 9;24(3):66. doi: 10.1208/s12248-022-00707-z.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Immunoassays and Mass Spectrometry for Determination of Protein Concentrations in Genetically Modified Crops.
J Agric Food Chem. 2024 Apr 12;72(16):8879-89. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c09188.
3
Overcoming Lot-to-Lot Variability in Protein Activity Using Epitope-Specific Calibration-Free Concentration Analysis.
Anal Chem. 2024 Apr 23;96(16):6275-6281. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05607. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
4
A novel biomarker assay qualification strategy for rare human matrices - a case study of biomarkers in aqueous humor.
Bioanalysis. 2024;16(8):239-247. doi: 10.4155/bio-2023-0127. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
5
Recent developments in mass-spectrometry-based targeted proteomics of clinical cancer biomarkers.
Clin Proteomics. 2024 Jan 30;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12014-024-09452-1.
6
Validation of Sputum Biomarker Immunoassays and Cytokine Expression Profiles in COPD.
Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 11;10(8):1949. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081949.
7
Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Mar 7;18(3):e1009223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009223. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Differentiating iron-loading anemias using a newly developed and analytically validated ELISA for human serum erythroferrone.
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 20;16(7):e0254851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254851. eCollection 2021.
9
Retrospective and Prospective Look at Aflatoxin Research and Development from a Practical Standpoint.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 27;16(19):3633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193633.
10
Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid proteins as potential biomarkers for early stage Parkinson's disease diagnosis.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206536. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

3
5
Validation of a multiplex electrochemiluminescent immunoassay platform in human and mouse samples.
J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jun;408:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.006. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
8
Utility, reliability and reproducibility of immunoassay multiplex kits.
Methods. 2013 May 15;61(1):23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
9
A condensed performance-validation strategy for multiplex detection kits used in studies of human clinical samples.
J Immunol Methods. 2013 Jan 31;387(1-2):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
10
Validation of a multiplex immunoassay for serum angiogenic factors as biomarkers for aggressive prostate cancer.
Clin Chim Acta. 2012 Oct 9;413(19-20):1506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Jun 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验