PharmaCadence Analytical Services, LLC, 1440 Industry Road, Hatfield, PA, 19940, USA.
Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN, 46285, USA.
AAPS J. 2022 May 9;24(3):66. doi: 10.1208/s12248-022-00707-z.
Decades of discussion and publication have gone into the guidance from the scientific community and the regulatory agencies on the use and validation of pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assays by chromatographic and ligand binding assays for the measurement of drugs and metabolites. These assay validations are well described in the FDA Guidance on Bioanalytical Methods Validation (BMV, 2018). While the BMV included biomarker assay validation, the focus was on understanding the challenges posed in validating biomarker assays and the importance of having reliable biomarker assays when used for regulatory submissions, rather than definition of the appropriate experiments to be performed. Different from PK bioanalysis, analysis of biomarkers can be challenging due to the presence of target analyte(s) in the control matrices used for calibrator and quality control sample preparation, and greater difficulty in procuring appropriate reference standards representative of the endogenous molecule. Several papers have been published offering recommendations for biomarker assay validation. The situational nature of biomarker applications necessitates fit-for-purpose (FFP) assay validation. A unifying theme for FFP analysis is that method validation requirements be consistent with the proposed context of use (COU) for any given biomarker. This communication provides specific recommendations for biomarker assay validation (BAV) by LC-MS, for both small and large molecule biomarkers. The consensus recommendations include creation of a validation plan that contains definition of the COU of the assay, use of the PK assay validation elements that support the COU, and definition of assay validation elements adapted to fit biomarker assays and the acceptance criteria for both.
数十年来,科学界和监管机构一直在讨论和发布有关使用和验证色谱和配体结合分析测定法进行药物和代谢物的药代动力学和毒代动力学测定的指南。这些测定验证在 FDA 的生物分析方法验证指南(BMV,2018 年)中有详细描述。虽然 BMV 包括生物标志物测定验证,但重点是了解验证生物标志物测定所面临的挑战,以及在用于监管提交时拥有可靠的生物标志物测定的重要性,而不是定义要进行的适当实验。与 PK 生物分析不同,由于用于校准品和质控样品制备的对照基质中存在靶分析物,因此分析生物标志物可能具有挑战性,并且更难以获得代表内源性分子的适当参考标准。已经发表了几篇论文,提出了生物标志物测定验证的建议。生物标志物应用的情况需要适合目的(FFP)的测定验证。FFP 分析的一个统一主题是,方法验证要求与任何给定生物标志物的拟议使用情况(COU)一致。本通讯提供了通过 LC-MS 进行生物标志物测定验证(BAV)的具体建议,包括小分子和大分子生物标志物。共识建议包括创建一个验证计划,其中包含测定的 COU 的定义、使用支持 COU 的 PK 测定验证要素,以及定义适应生物标志物测定的测定验证要素和两者的验收标准。