Miguel Caio F, Frampton Sarah E, Lantaya Charisse A, LaFrance Danielle L, Quah Kelly, Meyer Careen S, Elias Nassim C, Fernand Jonathan K
California State University, Sacramento.
H.O.P.E. Consulting, LLC.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Sep;104(2):96-118. doi: 10.1002/jeab.167.
This study assessed whether tact training would establish analogies as measured by equivalence-equivalence relations. In Experiment 1, six college students were trained to tact "same" or "different" in the presence of AB and BC compounds based on component class membership (e.g., A1B1 as "same", and A1B2 as "different"), and then tested on emergent tacts (BA, CB, AC, CA) and equivalence-equivalence relations. Only one of six participants passed all tests without remedial training. In Experiment 2, six college students were trained to tact only compounds belonging to the same class as "same". Three of six participants passed all tests without remedial training. In Experiment 3, six college students were trained to tact stimuli belonging to the same class with a common name prior to exposure to relational tact training. All participants passed tests without remedial training. In Experiment 4, eight college students were trained to tact stimuli belonging to the same class with a common name. Six participants passed without remedial training, while two, who did not tact the relation of the compounds, did not. Results from these studies suggest that simple discrimination of individual components and their relation in the form of tacts is related with equivalence performance.
本研究评估了触觉训练是否会建立起通过等价-等价关系衡量的类比。在实验1中,六名大学生接受训练,根据成分类别归属在AB和BC化合物出现时说出“相同”或“不同”(例如,将A1B1视为“相同”,将A1B2视为“不同”),然后对其进行新兴触觉测试(BA、CB、AC、CA)和等价-等价关系测试。六名参与者中只有一人在没有补救训练的情况下通过了所有测试。在实验2中,六名大学生接受训练,仅将属于同一类别的化合物说成“相同”。六名参与者中有三人在没有补救训练的情况下通过了所有测试。在实验3中,六名大学生在接受关系触觉训练之前,先接受训练,用一个通用名称说出属于同一类别的刺激。所有参与者在没有补救训练的情况下通过了测试。在实验4中,八名大学生接受训练,用一个通用名称说出属于同一类别的刺激。六名参与者在没有补救训练的情况下通过了测试,但有两名没有说出化合物之间关系的参与者没有通过。这些研究结果表明,以触觉形式对单个成分及其关系进行简单辨别与等价表现相关。