Suppr超能文献

科学的语言。

The Language of Science.

作者信息

Normand Matthew P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Ave, Stockton, CA 95211 USA.

出版信息

Perspect Behav Sci. 2017 Nov 1;42(3):675-688. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0123-8. eCollection 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Science is what scientists do and, especially, what they say about what they do. Science is a way of talking about the world that enables the listener to behave more effectively in that world. Understanding science, then, is a matter of understanding the language of science. Scientific verbal practices are codified and recorded so that they can affect the behavior of all scientists, including those without access to the original controlling variables. What we know about the world is simply the way we have learned to talk about the world. We know best what is most useful about the world, in the sense that what we know enables us to behave effectively in the world. Scientists are unique in that they, more so than non-scientists, have the experience of behaving as effectively as possible-they can predict and control. This is what makes all the difference, in the sense that it makes science different from other ways of knowing about the world. Science is not simply one way of knowing about the world, it is arguably the most effective way of knowing about it. Scientific talk leads to effective action.

摘要

科学是科学家们所从事的活动,尤其是他们对自己所做之事的描述。科学是一种谈论世界的方式,能让听众在那个世界中更有效地行动。那么,理解科学就是理解科学语言的问题。科学的言语实践被编纂和记录下来,以便它们能影响所有科学家的行为,包括那些无法接触到原始控制变量的科学家。我们对世界的了解仅仅是我们学会谈论世界的方式。从我们所知道的能让我们在世界中有效行动的意义上来说,我们最了解世界上最有用的东西。科学家之所以独特,是因为与非科学家相比,他们更能体验到尽可能有效地行动——他们能够预测和控制。从它使科学不同于其他认识世界的方式这个意义上来说,这就是关键所在。科学不仅仅是一种认识世界的方式,它可以说是认识世界最有效的方式。科学的谈论会带来有效的行动。

相似文献

1
The Language of Science.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2017 Nov 1;42(3):675-688. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0123-8. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Who Has the Last Word? Radical Behaviorism, Science, and Verbal Behavior about Verbal Behavior.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Feb 20;43(2):343-359. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00249-9. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
5
EMPIRICISM IN LATTER-DAY BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE.
Science. 1964 Jul 31;145(3631):464-7. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3631.464.
6
Western epistemology: a stranger in a strange land?
Pac Health Dialog. 2010 Sep;16(2):112-8.
7
A brief philosophical encounter with science and medicine.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2013 Jul 25;1(2):103-5. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2013.17. eCollection 2013 Aug.
8
Science Bashing: Is it a global In-thing?
J Assoc Physicians India. 2017 Mar;65(3):82-83.
9
A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1032-1055. doi: 10.1111/brv.12385. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
The Influence of Bloomfield's Linguistics on Skinner.
Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;30(2):133-51. doi: 10.1007/BF03392151.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Experts' Consensus on Behavioral Principles.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Jul 15;47(3):627-642. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00416-2. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Editorial: Examining community-engaged and participatory research programs and projects.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 21;11:1239670. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1239670. eCollection 2023.
3
Behavior analytic jargon does not seem to influence treatment acceptability ratings.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2022 Oct;55(4):1294-1305. doi: 10.1002/jaba.953. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Who Has the Last Word? Radical Behaviorism, Science, and Verbal Behavior about Verbal Behavior.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Feb 20;43(2):343-359. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00249-9. eCollection 2020 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
On Intraverbal Control and the Definition of the Intraverbal.
Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Sep 12;32(2):96-106. doi: 10.1007/s40616-016-0061-7. eCollection 2016 Oct.
2
What Has Happened to Skinner's Empirical Epistemology?
Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;36(2):277-281. doi: 10.1007/BF03392314.
3
Some Implications of a Behavioral Analysis of Verbal Behavior for Logic and Mathematics.
Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;36(2):267-276. doi: 10.1007/BF03392313.
4
A Functional Analysis of Psychological Terms Redux.
Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;36(2):255-266. doi: 10.1007/BF03392312.
5
The effects of tact training on the development of analogical reasoning.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Sep;104(2):96-118. doi: 10.1002/jeab.167.
6
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
7
Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):528-30. doi: 10.1177/1745691612465253.
8
Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 May;18(5):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
9
On the origin and functions of the term functional analysis.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Spring;46(1):285-8. doi: 10.1002/jaba.6. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
10
Behaviorism and the stages of scientific activity.
Behav Anal. 2010 Spring;33(1):47-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03392203.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验