Mangerich Aswin, Debiak Malgorzata, Birtel Matthias, Ponath Viviane, Balszuweit Frank, Lex Kirsten, Martello Rita, Burckhardt-Boer Waltraud, Strobelt Romano, Siegert Markus, Thiermann Horst, Steinritz Dirk, Schmidt Annette, Bürkle Alexander
University of Konstanz, Molecular Toxicology Group, Department of Biology, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.
Bundeswehr Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 80937 Munich, Germany.
Toxicol Lett. 2016 Feb 26;244:56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
Mustard agents are potent DNA alkylating agents with mutagenic, cytotoxic and vesicant properties. They include bi-functional agents, such as sulfur mustard (SM) or nitrogen mustard (mustine, HN2), as well as mono-functional agents, such as "half mustard" (CEES). Whereas SM has been used as a chemical warfare agent, several nitrogen mustard derivatives, such as chlorambucil and cyclophosphamide, are being used as established chemotherapeutics. Upon induction of specific forms of genotoxic stimuli, several poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) synthesize the nucleic acid-like biopolymer poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) by using NAD(+) as a substrate. Previously, it was shown that SM triggers cellular poly(ADP-ribosyl) ation (PARylation), but so far this phenomenon is poorly characterized. In view of the protective effects of PARP inhibitors, the latter have been proposed as a treatment option of SM-exposed victims. In an accompanying article (Debiak et al., 2016), we have provided an optimized protocol for the analysis of the CEES-induced PARylation response in HaCaT keratinocytes, which forms an experimental basis to further analyze mustard-induced PARylation and its functional consequences, in general. Thus, in the present study, we performed a comprehensive characterization of the PARylation response in HaCaT cells after treatment with four different mustard agents, i.e., SM, CEES, HN2, and chlorambucil, on a qualitative, quantitative and functional level. In particular, we recorded substance-specific as well as dose- and time-dependent PARylation responses using independent bioanalytical methods based on single-cell immuno-fluorescence microscopy and quantitative isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Furthermore, we analyzed if and how PARylation contributes to mustard-induced toxicity by treating HaCaT cells with CEES, SM, and HN2 in combination with the clinically relevant PARP inhibitor ABT888. As evaluated by a novel immunofluorescence-based protocol for the detection of N7-ETE-guanine DNA adducts, the excision rate of CEES-induced DNA adducts was not affected by PARP inhibition. Furthermore, while CEES induced moderate changes in cellular NAD(+) levels, annexin V/PI flow cytometry analysis revealed that these changes did not affect CEES-induced short-term cytotoxicity 24h after treatment. In contrast, PARP inhibition impaired cell proliferation and clonogenic survival, and potentiated micronuclei formation of HaCaT cells upon CEES treatment. Similarly, PARP inhibition affected clonogenic survival of cells treated with bi-functional mustards such as SM and HN2. In conclusion, we demonstrate that PARylation plays a functional role in mustard-induced cellular stress response with substance-specific differences. Since PARP inhibitors exhibit therapeutic potential to treat SM-related pathologies and to sensitize cancer cells for mustard-based chemotherapy, potential long-term effects of PARP inhibition on genomic stability and carcinogenesis should be carefully considered when pursuing such a strategy.
芥子气是具有诱变、细胞毒性和发泡特性的强效DNA烷化剂。它们包括双功能剂,如硫芥(SM)或氮芥(盐酸氮芥,HN2),以及单功能剂,如“半芥子气”(2-氯乙基乙硫醚,CEES)。虽然SM曾被用作化学战剂,但几种氮芥衍生物,如苯丁酸氮芥和环磷酰胺,已被用作成熟的化疗药物。在诱导特定形式的基因毒性刺激后,几种聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)以NAD(+)为底物合成核酸样生物聚合物聚(ADP-核糖)(PAR)。此前已表明,SM会触发细胞多聚(ADP-核糖基)化(PARylation),但到目前为止,这一现象的特征尚不明确。鉴于PARP抑制剂的保护作用,有人提出将其作为芥子气暴露受害者的一种治疗选择。在一篇配套文章(Debiak等人,2016年)中,我们提供了一种优化的方案,用于分析CEES诱导的HaCaT角质形成细胞中的PARylation反应,这为进一步分析芥子气诱导的PARylation及其功能后果奠定了实验基础。因此,在本研究中,我们在定性、定量和功能水平上对HaCaT细胞在用四种不同芥子气剂(即SM、CEES、HN2和苯丁酸氮芥)处理后的PARylation反应进行了全面表征。特别是,我们使用基于单细胞免疫荧光显微镜和定量同位素稀释质谱的独立生物分析方法记录了物质特异性以及剂量和时间依赖性的PARylation反应。此外,我们通过将HaCaT细胞与临床相关的PARP抑制剂ABT888联合用CEES、SM和HN2处理,分析了PARylation是否以及如何导致芥子气诱导的毒性。通过一种基于免疫荧光的新型方案检测N7-乙基硫代鸟嘌呤DNA加合物评估,CEES诱导的DNA加合物切除率不受PARP抑制的影响。此外,虽然CEES诱导细胞NAD(+)水平发生适度变化,但膜联蛋白V/碘化丙啶流式细胞术分析表明,这些变化在处理后24小时不影响CEES诱导的短期细胞毒性。相反,PARP抑制损害细胞增殖和克隆形成存活,并增强CEES处理后HaCaT细胞的微核形成。同样,PARP抑制影响用双功能芥子气如SM和HN2处理的细胞的克隆形成存活。总之,我们证明PARylation在芥子气诱导的细胞应激反应中发挥功能作用,且存在物质特异性差异。由于PARP抑制剂在治疗与SM相关的疾病以及使癌细胞对基于芥子气的化疗敏感方面具有治疗潜力,在采用这种策略时,应仔细考虑PARP抑制对基因组稳定性和致癌作用的潜在长期影响。