Liu Ting, Tatham Andrew J, Gracitelli Carolina P B, Zangwill Linda M, Weinreb Robert N, Medeiros Felipe A
Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Department of Ophthalmology, Daping Hospital & Research Institute of Surgery, Third Military Medical University of the People's Liberation Army, Chongqing, China.
Hamilton Glaucoma Center and Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Nov;122(11):2243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.027. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
To determine whether progressive retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss occurs in the contralateral eye of patients with glaucoma showing unilateral progression according to conventional diagnostic methods.
Prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study.
Three hundred forty-six eyes of 173 patients (118 eyes with glaucoma and 228 eyes with suspect glaucoma at baseline) followed up for an average of 3.5±0.7 years.
All subjects underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP; Humphrey Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) and spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT; Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) in both eyes at 6-month intervals. Eyes were determined as progressing by conventional methods if there was progression on masked grading of optic disc stereophotographs or SAP Guided Progression Analysis (GPA; Carl Zeiss Meditec; "likely progression"). Rates of change in SD OCT average RNFL thickness were obtained using a linear mixed effects model. Rate of global loss was calculated using a random coefficient model and compared for nonprogressing patients, progressing eyes, and fellow eyes of unilateral progressing patients.
Rate of change in global RNFL thickness.
Thirty-nine subjects showed evidence of unilateral progression by GPA, disc photographs, or both during follow-up. Mean ± standard error rate of RNFL loss in eyes progressing by conventional methods was -0.89±0.22 μm/year (P<0.001). The contralateral eyes of these subjects also showed significant loss of RNFL over time (-1.00±0.20 μm/year; P<0.001). One hundred thirty-four subjects did not show progression by conventional methods in either eye. These eyes also showed a significant decline over time in average RNFL thickness (-0.71±0.09 μm/year; P<0.001); however, the rate of change in these eyes was slower than that of the contralateral eye of patients showing unilateral progression (P<0.001).
Loss of RNFL thickness was seen in a substantial number of contralateral eyes of glaucoma patients showing unilateral progression by conventional methods. These findings indicate that assessment of RNFL thickness by SD OCT may show progressive glaucomatous damage that is not detected by visual fields or optic disc stereophotography.
根据传统诊断方法,确定青光眼单侧进展患者的对侧眼中是否会发生视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)的进行性丢失。
前瞻性、纵向、观察性队列研究。
173例患者的346只眼(基线时118只青光眼眼和228只疑似青光眼眼),平均随访3.5±0.7年。
所有受试者每6个月接受一次双眼标准自动视野计检查(SAP;Humphrey视野分析仪;Carl Zeiss Meditec,加利福尼亚州都柏林)和光谱域(SD)光学相干断层扫描(OCT;Spectralis;Heidelberg Engineering公司,加利福尼亚州卡尔斯巴德)。如果在视盘立体照片的遮蔽分级或SAP引导进展分析(GPA;Carl Zeiss Meditec;“可能进展”)中有进展,则根据传统方法确定眼睛为进展性。使用线性混合效应模型获得SD OCT平均RNFL厚度的变化率。使用随机系数模型计算总体丢失率,并对未进展患者、进展性眼和单侧进展患者的对侧眼进行比较。
总体RNFL厚度的变化率。
39名受试者在随访期间通过GPA、视盘照片或两者显示出单侧进展的证据。通过传统方法进展的眼中RNFL丢失的平均±标准误率为-0.89±0.22μm/年(P<0.001)。这些受试者的对侧眼随着时间的推移也显示出RNFL的显著丢失(-1.00±0.20μm/年;P<0.001)。134名受试者的两只眼中均未通过传统方法显示进展。这些眼的平均RNFL厚度也随着时间的推移显著下降(-0.71±0.09μm/年;P<0.001);然而,这些眼的变化率比显示单侧进展的患者的对侧眼慢(P<0.001)。
在通过传统方法显示单侧进展的青光眼患者的大量对侧眼中观察到RNFL厚度的丢失。这些发现表明,通过SD OCT评估RNFL厚度可能显示出视野或视盘立体摄影未检测到的进行性青光眼损害。