Birch Stephen, Govender Veloshnee, Fried Jana, Eyles John, Daries Vanessa, Moshabela Mosa, Cleary Susan
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Canada, Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, UK,
Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Health Policy Plan. 2016 May;31(4):454-61. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv084. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
Directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) has been the recommended strategy for Tuberculosis (TB) control since 1995. Developed as an alternative to inpatient treatment, it involves observation of patients' medication intake to promote adherence. However, the burden of daily clinic visits may affect access to care. Using a mixed methods approach, we consider whether (1) non-adherence differs systematically between patients required to make daily clinic visits and patients cared for under less frequent clinic visits and (2) the association between frequency of required clinic visits and adherence depends on affordability and acceptability of care. Data were collected in facility exit interviews with 1200 TB patients in two rural and two urban sub-districts in South Africa. Additionally, 17 in-depth interviews were completed with TB patients. After controlling for socioeconomic and demographic factors, patient type (new or retreatment) and treatment duration, regression analyses showed that daily attending patients were over twice as likely to report a missed clinic visit (P < 0.001) or a missed dose of treatment (P = 0.002) compared with patients required to attend clinics for treatment collection less frequently. Missed visits increased with treatment duration (P = 0.01). The significant interaction between clinic visit frequency and treatment duration indicated that sustaining daily visits over time may become increasingly difficult over the course of treatment. The qualitative analysis identified treatment cost and duration, patients' physical condition and varying social contexts (family, community and work) as important influences on adherence. These findings suggest that strategies involving daily clinic visits may require reconsideration if resources for TB care are to be used efficiently. The adoption of approaches that place patient interests at the centre of TB treatment delivery would appear to be of high priority, particularly in countries where TB prevalence is high and resources for TB care are highly constrained.
自1995年以来,直接观察短程治疗(DOTS)一直是结核病(TB)控制的推荐策略。作为住院治疗的替代方案,它包括观察患者的药物摄入情况以促进依从性。然而,每日门诊就诊的负担可能会影响获得治疗的机会。我们采用混合方法,考虑以下两点:(1)需要每日门诊就诊的患者与就诊频率较低的患者之间,不依从情况是否存在系统性差异;(2)所需门诊就诊频率与依从性之间的关联是否取决于治疗的可负担性和可接受性。我们在南非两个农村和两个城市街道对1200名结核病患者进行了出院访谈,并收集了相关数据。此外,还对结核病患者进行了17次深入访谈。在控制了社会经济和人口因素、患者类型(新发病例或复治病例)以及治疗持续时间后,回归分析表明,与就诊频率较低的患者相比,每日就诊的患者报告错过门诊就诊(P < 0.001)或错过一剂治疗(P = 0.002)的可能性高出两倍多。错过就诊的情况随着治疗持续时间的延长而增加(P = 0.01)。门诊就诊频率与治疗持续时间之间的显著交互作用表明,随着时间的推移,维持每日就诊可能会在治疗过程中变得越来越困难。定性分析确定治疗成本和持续时间、患者的身体状况以及不同的社会背景(家庭、社区和工作)是影响依从性的重要因素。这些发现表明,如果要有效利用结核病治疗资源,涉及每日门诊就诊的策略可能需要重新考虑。将患者利益置于结核病治疗核心的方法的采用似乎具有高度优先性,特别是在结核病患病率高且结核病治疗资源高度有限的国家。