McLaughlin Brian P, Green E J
Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1541-5. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0780-5.
We argue that Hoffman, Singh, and Prakash (Psychon Bull Rev, this issue) have not made the case that "the language of space-time and physical objects is the wrong language for describing the true structure of the objective world." Further, we contend that, contrary to what Hoffman et al. claim, the perceptual icons posited by interface theory seem best taken to be sense data.
我们认为，霍夫曼、辛格和普拉卡什（《心理通报与评论》，本期）并未证明“时空和物理对象的语言是描述客观世界真实结构的错误语言”这一观点。此外，我们认为，与霍夫曼等人所声称的相反，界面理论所假定的感知图标似乎最宜被视为感觉材料。
