Li-Sha Ge, Peng Chen, Yue-Chun Li
Department of Pediatric, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325000, China.
Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 109 Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Sep 18;15:101. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0092-3.
Platelets play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and acute and chronic complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet inhibition is a cornerstone in the management of these patients. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a bleeding disorder characterized by premature platelet destruction mediated by autoantibodies. The safety of antiplatelet therapy and PCI in patients who have ACS and ITP is unknown. The aim of the present study is to discuss the management strategies for patients who have ACS and ITP and to review limited data available in the literature.
We report the case of a patient with ITP who underwent three separate coronary interventions. The first PCI with stenting was performed in the left anterior descending artery 5 years ago while the patient suffered an anterior acute myocardial infarction, and the platelet count at admission was 90 × 10(9)/L. The patient presented with recurrent ACS and severe in-stent restenosis 5 years after the first PCI, and the platelet count at admission was 18 × 10(9)/L, and elevated to 87 × 10(9)/L after platelets transfusion. He was treated successfully with cutting balloon angioplasty under anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and antiagregation with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel. Four months later after cutting balloon angioplasty, the patient received an intracoronary stent when he once again presented with recurrent ACS in the setting of restenosis. The patient has been observed for 1.5 years without restenosis after the third PCI.
We reviewed all the cases in the literature involving PCI and discussed the management strategies in patients with ITP and ACS. Available data suggest that PCI can be safe and feasible, and the risk-benefit equation of PCI procedures and antiplatelet therapies should be carefully evaluated, and the treatment should be individualized.
血小板在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的发病机制以及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的急慢性并发症中起关键作用。血小板抑制是这些患者治疗的基石。特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)是一种出血性疾病,其特征是自身抗体介导的血小板过早破坏。ACS合并ITP患者抗血小板治疗和PCI的安全性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨ACS合并ITP患者的管理策略,并回顾文献中有限的数据。
我们报告了1例ITP患者接受3次独立冠状动脉介入治疗的病例。第1次PCI并植入支架是在5年前患者发生前壁急性心肌梗死时,于左前降支进行,入院时血小板计数为90×10⁹/L。第1次PCI术后5年,患者出现复发性ACS和严重支架内再狭窄,入院时血小板计数为18×10⁹/L,输注血小板后升至87×10⁹/L。在普通肝素抗凝及阿司匹林和氯吡格雷抗聚集治疗下,他接受切割球囊血管成形术并获得成功。切割球囊血管成形术后4个月,患者再次因再狭窄合并复发性ACS接受冠状动脉内支架植入。第3次PCI术后,该患者已被观察1.5年,未出现再狭窄。
我们回顾了文献中所有涉及PCI的病例,并讨论了ITP合并ACS患者的管理策略。现有数据表明,PCI可能是安全可行的,应仔细评估PCI手术和抗血小板治疗的风险效益比,治疗应个体化。