Scholte J B J, Duong H L, Linssen C, Van Dessel H, Bergmans D, van der Horst R, Savelkoul P, Roekaerts P, van Mook W
Zentrum für Intensivmedizin, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Luzern 16, Switzerland.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;34(11):2295-305. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2482-y. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
The purpose of this investigation was to explore the presumed relationship between the days of hospitalisation and microorganisms identified by endotracheal aspirate cultures in relation to adequate empirical treatment strategies of pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU). All potentially pathogenic microorganisms identified by (surveillance) cultures of endotracheal aspirates obtained in the ICUs of two Dutch teaching hospitals in 2007 and 2012 were retrospectively collected and analysed. Antibiotic susceptibilities to 11 antibiotics were calculated for several time points (days or weeks) after hospital admission and expressed per patient-day. In total, 4184 potentially pathogenic microorganisms identified in 782 patients were analysed. Prevalence of the classic early-onset pneumonia-causing microorganisms decreased from 55 % on the first four days to 34 % on days 4-6 after hospital admission (p < 0.0001). Susceptibility to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was below 70 % on all days. Except for days 0 and 12, susceptibility to ceftriaxone was below 80 %. The overall susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam was 1518/1973 (77 %) in 2007 vs. 727/1008 (67 %) in 2012 (p < 0.0001). After day 8 of hospital admission, susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was below 80 % in 2012. After one week of hospital admission, susceptibilities to antibiotics were lower in the hospital that included that antibiotic in the local empirical treatment protocols as compared to the hospitals in which that antibiotic was not or infrequently included: 90/434 (21 %) vs. 117/398 (29 %); p = 0.004 for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and 203/433 (47 %) vs. 253/398 (64 %); p < 0.001 for ceftriaxone. No cut-off in the number of days after hospital admission could be identified to distinguish early-onset from late-onset pneumonia. Consequently, the choice of empirical antibiotics should probably not be based on the time of onset.
本研究的目的是探讨在重症监护病房(ICU)中,住院天数与气管内吸出物培养所鉴定的微生物之间的假定关系,以及与肺炎适当的经验性治疗策略的相关性。回顾性收集并分析了2007年和2012年在两家荷兰教学医院的ICU中通过气管内吸出物(监测)培养鉴定出的所有潜在致病微生物。计算了入院后几个时间点(天或周)对11种抗生素的药敏率,并按每患者日进行表达。总共分析了782例患者中鉴定出的4184种潜在致病微生物。引起经典早发性肺炎的微生物的患病率从入院后头四天的55%降至入院后第4 - 6天的34%(p<0.0001)。所有日子里对阿莫西林/克拉维酸的药敏率均低于70%。除了第0天和第12天,对头孢曲松的药敏率低于80%。2007年哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的总体药敏率为1518/1973(77%),2012年为727/1008(67%)(p<0.0001)。2012年入院第8天后,对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的药敏率低于80%。入院一周后,与未将该抗生素或很少将该抗生素纳入当地经验性治疗方案的医院相比,将该抗生素纳入当地经验性治疗方案的医院中该抗生素的药敏率较低:阿莫西林/克拉维酸为90/434(21%)对117/398(29%);p = 0.004;头孢曲松为203/433(47%)对253/398(64%);p<0.001。无法确定入院后天数的界限来区分早发性肺炎和晚发性肺炎。因此,经验性抗生素的选择可能不应基于发病时间。