Sastre Javier, Serrano Juan Jose, Fernández Cristina, Ramirez Carmen, Ortega Luis, García-Paredes Beatriz, Corona Juan, Alfonso Rosario, Córdoba Sofía, Díaz-Rubio Eduardo
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Center affiliated to Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa (RD06/0020/0021) Instituto Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain.
Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Center affiliated to Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa (RD06/0020/0021) Instituto Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 Jun;15(2):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
BACKGROUND: Providing adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is currently a matter of debate. Recommendations from clinical guidelines range from offering no treatment to oxaliplatin-based combinations. We present a risk-adapted approach based on the response to initial chemoradiation as the strongest prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred one patients were treated at a single institution with preoperative long-course radiotherapy plus concurrent fluoropyrimidines. Patients with disease downstaged to pT0-2N0 received adjuvant fluoropyrimidines alone, while the remaining received an oxaliplatin-based combination. The primary study end point was 5-year DFS. RESULTS: Overall, the disease of 54 patients was downstaged to pT0-2N0 (53.5%), while that of 47 patients was staged as pT3-4 or N+ (46.5%) after surgery. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 5-year DFS for patients in the good-prognosis group (downstaging to pT0-2 N0) and for those with poor prognosis (pT3-4 or N+) were 79.4% and 66.3%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.489; P = .043). Downstaging and pN+ were independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION: A risk-adapted adjuvant therapy strategy based on pathologic stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is feasible and achieves high rates of 5-year DFS. Patients with good prognostic factors can be treated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidines alone, thus permitting the avoidance of oxaliplatin-derived toxicities.
背景:新辅助放化疗后对局部晚期直肠癌进行辅助化疗目前存在争议。临床指南的建议范围从不进行治疗到基于奥沙利铂的联合治疗。我们提出一种基于对初始放化疗的反应的风险适应性方法,这是无病生存期(DFS)最强的预后因素。 患者与方法:101例患者在单一机构接受术前长程放疗加同期氟嘧啶治疗。疾病降期至pT0-2N0的患者仅接受辅助氟嘧啶治疗,其余患者接受基于奥沙利铂的联合治疗。主要研究终点是5年DFS。 结果:总体而言,54例患者的疾病在术后降期至pT0-2N0(53.5%),而47例患者分期为pT3-4或N+(46.5%)。在意向性分析中,预后良好组(降期至pT0-2 N0)和预后不良组(pT3-4或N+)患者的5年DFS分别为79.4%和66.3%(风险比,0.489;P = .043)。降期和pN+是DFS的独立预后因素。 结论:基于新辅助放化疗后病理分期的风险适应性辅助治疗策略是可行的,并实现了较高的5年DFS率。具有良好预后因素的患者可仅接受辅助氟嘧啶治疗,从而避免奥沙利铂相关的毒性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014-11-14