Prins Seth J, Bates Lisa M, Keyes Katherine M, Muntaner Carles
Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, USA.
Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto.
Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Nov;37(8):1352-72. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12315. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
Despite a well-established social gradient for many mental disorders, there is evidence that individuals near the middle of the social hierarchy suffer higher rates of depression and anxiety than those at the top or bottom. Although prevailing indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) cannot detect or easily explain such patterns, relational theories of social class, which emphasise political-economic processes and dimensions of power, might. We test whether the relational construct of contradictory class location, which embodies aspects of both ownership and labour, can explain this nonlinear pattern. Data on full-time workers from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (n = 21859) show that occupants of contradictory class locations have higher prevalence and odds of depression and anxiety than occupants of non-contradictory class locations. These findings suggest that the effects of class relations on depression and anxiety extend beyond those of SES, pointing to under-studied mechanisms in social epidemiology, for example, domination and exploitation.
尽管许多精神障碍存在既定的社会梯度,但有证据表明,社会等级制度中层的个体比顶层或底层的个体患抑郁症和焦虑症的几率更高。虽然社会经济地位(SES)的主流指标无法检测或轻易解释这种模式,但强调政治经济过程和权力维度的社会阶层关系理论或许可以。我们检验了体现所有权和劳动两方面特征的矛盾阶级地位的关系结构是否能够解释这种非线性模式。来自全国酒精及相关状况流行病学调查的全职工作者数据(n = 21859)显示,处于矛盾阶级地位的个体比处于非矛盾阶级地位的个体患抑郁症和焦虑症的患病率及几率更高。这些发现表明,阶级关系对抑郁症和焦虑症的影响超出了社会经济地位的影响,指向了社会流行病学中尚未充分研究的机制,例如支配和剥削。