McRae-Clark Aimee L, Baker Nathaniel L, Gray Kevin M, Killeen Therese K, Wagner Amanda M, Brady Kathleen T, DeVane C Lindsay, Norton Jessica
Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Nov 1;156:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of buspirone, a partial 5-HT1A agonist, for treatment of cannabis dependence.
One hundred seventy-five cannabis-dependent adults were randomized to receive either up to 60mg/day of buspirone (n=88) or placebo (n=87) for 12 weeks combined with a brief motivational enhancement therapy intervention and contingency management to encourage study retention. Cannabis use outcomes were assessed via weekly urine cannabinoid tests.
Participants in both groups reported reduced cannabis craving over the course of the study; however, buspirone provided no advantage over placebo in reducing cannabis use. Significant gender by treatment interactions were observed, with women randomized to buspirone having fewer negative urine cannabinoid tests than women randomized to placebo (p=0.007), and men randomized to buspirone having significantly lower creatinine adjusted cannabinoid levels as compared to those randomized to placebo (p=0.023). An evaluation of serotonin allelic variations did not find an association with buspirone treatment response.
Buspirone was not more efficacious than placebo in reducing cannabis use. Important gender differences were noted, with women having worse cannabis use outcomes with buspirone treatment. Considerations for future medication trials in this challenging population are discussed.
本研究旨在评估5-羟色胺1A受体部分激动剂丁螺环酮治疗大麻依赖的疗效。
175名大麻依赖的成年人被随机分为两组,一组接受最高60毫克/天的丁螺环酮治疗(n = 88),另一组接受安慰剂治疗(n = 87),为期12周,同时结合简短的动机增强疗法干预和应急管理以鼓励患者坚持参与研究。通过每周的尿液大麻素检测评估大麻使用结果。
两组参与者在研究过程中均报告大麻渴望减少;然而,在减少大麻使用方面,丁螺环酮并不比安慰剂更具优势。观察到治疗与性别的显著交互作用,随机接受丁螺环酮治疗的女性尿液大麻素检测呈阴性的次数少于随机接受安慰剂治疗的女性(p = 0.007),随机接受丁螺环酮治疗的男性肌酐调整后的大麻素水平显著低于随机接受安慰剂治疗的男性(p = 0.023)。对血清素等位基因变异的评估未发现与丁螺环酮治疗反应相关。
在减少大麻使用方面,丁螺环酮并不比安慰剂更有效。注意到重要的性别差异,女性接受丁螺环酮治疗时大麻使用结果更差。讨论了在这一具有挑战性的人群中未来药物试验的考虑因素。