Sørgaard Mathias, Linde Jesper James, Kofoed Klaus Fuglsang, Kühl Jørgen Tobias, Kelbæk Henning, Nielsen Walter Bjørn, Hove Jens Dahlgaard
Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cardiology. 2016;133(1):10-7. doi: 10.1159/000438980. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
In the recently updated clinical guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology on the management of stable coronary artery disease (CAD), the updated Diamond Forrester score has been included as a pretest probability (PTP) score to select patients for further diagnostic testing. We investigated the validity of the new guidelines in a population of patients with acute-onset chest pain.
We examined 527 consecutive patients with either an exercise-ECG stress test or single-photon emission computed tomography, and subsequently coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We compared the diagnostic accuracy of PTP and stress testing assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to identify significant CAD, defined as at least 1 coronary artery branch with >70% diameter stenosis identified by CCTA.
The diagnostic accuracy of PTP was significantly higher than the stress test (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.69; p = 0.009), but the diagnostic accuracy of the combination of PTP and a stress test did not significantly increase when compared to PTP alone (AUC 0.86 vs. 0.80; p = 0.06).
PTP using the updated Diamond and Forrester Score is a very useful tool in risk-stratifying patients with acute-onset chest pain at a low-to-intermediate risk of having CAD. Adding a stress test to PTP does not appear to offer significant diagnostic benefit.
在欧洲心脏病学会最近更新的关于稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)管理的临床指南中,更新后的钻石-弗罗斯特评分已被纳入作为预测试概率(PTP)评分,以选择患者进行进一步的诊断测试。我们在急性胸痛患者群体中研究了新指南的有效性。
我们检查了527例连续接受运动心电图负荷试验或单光子发射计算机断层扫描,随后接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)的患者。我们比较了通过受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积评估的PTP和负荷试验的诊断准确性,以识别显著CAD,定义为CCTA识别出至少1个冠状动脉分支直径狭窄>70%。
PTP的诊断准确性显著高于负荷试验(AUC 0.80对0.69;p = 0.009),但与单独使用PTP相比,PTP与负荷试验联合使用时的诊断准确性没有显著提高(AUC 0.86对0.80;p = 0.06)。
使用更新后的钻石和弗罗斯特评分的PTP是对CAD风险处于低至中度的急性胸痛患者进行风险分层的非常有用的工具。在PTP基础上增加负荷试验似乎没有显著的诊断益处。