Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术在因胸痛转诊的门诊患者中的诊断和治疗价值

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Usefulness of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Out-Clinic Patients Referred for Chest Pain.

作者信息

Bom Michiel J, van der Zee Petrus M, Cornel Jan H, van der Zant Friso M, Knol Remco J J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 1;116(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is widely used to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with low-to-intermediate pretest probability (PTP) of obstructive CAD. The aim of our study was to investigate the reclassification by CCTA and the implications of CCTA results on management because limited studies exist on these subjects; 1,560 patients with chest pain without a history of CAD and with low or intermediate PTP of CAD referred for CCTA from the out-patient clinic were prospectively included. PTP was defined by the Duke Clinical Score as either low (<15%), low-intermediate (15% to 50%), or high-intermediate (50% to 85%). Distribution of CCTA results among the categories of PTP of CAD and the influence of CCTA results on management were analyzed. CCTA revealed obstructive CAD in 7%, 15%, and 23% of cases, in patients with low, low-intermediate, and high-intermediate PTP, respectively; 855 of 1,031 patients (83%) with intermediate PTP of CAD showed no obstructive CAD on CCTA and were consequently reclassified. Management changes after CCTA occurred in 689 patients (44%). In 633 patients (41%), medication was altered and 135 (9%) were referred for invasive coronary angiography. Treatment with statin was initiated in 442 (28%) and stopped in 71 patients (5%). Aspirin was initiated in 192 (12%) and stopped in 139 patients (9%). In conclusion, in a routine clinical cohort, CCTA resulted in reclassification in most patients. Furthermore, our study suggests that the Duke Clinical Score overestimates the probability of obstructive CAD compared with CCTA findings. Finally, CCTA results have implications on patient management, with medication changes in 41% of patients.

摘要

冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)被广泛用于排除阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)预测试概率低至中等(PTP)的患者的冠状动脉疾病。我们研究的目的是调查CCTA的重新分类以及CCTA结果对治疗的影响,因为关于这些主题的研究有限;前瞻性纳入了1560例因胸痛前来门诊就诊、无CAD病史且CAD的PTP为低或中等的患者进行CCTA检查。PTP由杜克临床评分定义为低(<15%)、低中等(15%至50%)或高中等(50%至85%)。分析了CAD的PTP类别中CCTA结果的分布以及CCTA结果对治疗的影响。CCTA分别在PTP低、低中等和高中等的患者中发现7%、15%和23%的病例存在阻塞性CAD;1031例CAD的PTP为中等的患者中有855例(83%)在CCTA上未显示阻塞性CAD,因此被重新分类。689例患者(44%)在CCTA后治疗发生了改变。633例患者(41%)药物治疗方案改变,135例(9%)被转诊进行有创冠状动脉造影。442例(28%)开始使用他汀类药物治疗,71例(5%)停用。192例(12%)开始使用阿司匹林,139例(9%)停用。总之,在一个常规临床队列中,CCTA使大多数患者得到重新分类。此外,我们的研究表明,与CCTA结果相比,杜克临床评分高估了阻塞性CAD的概率。最后,CCTA结果对患者治疗有影响,41%的患者药物治疗方案发生改变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验