Coscas Gabriel J, Lupidi Marco, Coscas Florence, Cagini Carlo, Souied Eric H
*Odeon Ophthalmic Center, Paris, France; †Department of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France; and ‡Department of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Perugia, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Retina. 2015 Nov;35(11):2219-28. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000766.
To compare optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with traditional multimodal imaging in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration in terms of guiding the treatment decision.
Prospective case series of 80 eyes of 73 consecutive patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (39 women, mean age: 79.4 ± 5.3 years) diagnosed with different types of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (58 Type I, 2 Type II, 6 mixed Type I and II, 3 retinal angiomatous proliferation, and 11 age-related macular degeneration-related polyps). The data obtained from traditional multimodal imaging, based on fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and OCT were used to assess the need for treatment, those obtained from OCTA to identify two different patterns of CNV. Traditional multimodal imaging and OCTA findings were then compared with evaluate possible correspondence between treatment decision and CNV aspect on OCTA.
A CNV lesion was identified as Group A (requiring treatment) in 58 eyes (72.5%) in traditional multimodal imaging. On OCTA in 59 eyes (73.7%), the lesion was defined as Pattern I and the remaining 21 (26.3%) as Pattern II. There was 94.9% correspondence between the Pattern I CNV on OCTA and the cases Group A on conventional multimodal imaging. It was also computed 90.5% correspondence between Pattern II CNV on OCTA and the Group B (not requiring treatment) cases on conventional multimodal imaging. There was high (P < 0.05) interobserver agreement both for treatment decision in conventional multimodal and for Patterns (I or II) defining on OCTA imaging analysis.
This study demonstrates a high level of correspondence, in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration, between different CNV patterns identified on OCTA and treatment decisions established on conventional multimodal imaging. Although fluorescein angiography remains the gold standard for determining the presence of leakage, and OCT shows fluid accumulation and its variations, OCTA may now offer noninvasive monitoring of the CNV, aiding for each treatment decision during the follow-up.
比较光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)与传统多模态成像在渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中指导治疗决策方面的效果。
对73例连续的渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的80只眼进行前瞻性病例系列研究(39名女性,平均年龄:79.4±5.3岁),这些患者被诊断为不同类型的脉络膜新生血管(CNV)(58例I型,2例II型,6例I型和II型混合,3例视网膜血管瘤样增殖,11例年龄相关性黄斑变性相关息肉)。从基于荧光素血管造影、吲哚菁绿血管造影和OCT的传统多模态成像中获得的数据用于评估治疗需求,从OCTA中获得的数据用于识别两种不同的CNV模式。然后比较传统多模态成像和OCTA的结果,以评估治疗决策与OCTA上CNV表现之间的可能对应关系。
在传统多模态成像中,58只眼(72.5%)的CNV病变被确定为A组(需要治疗)。在OCTA上,59只眼(73.7%)的病变被定义为模式I,其余21只眼(26.3%)为模式II。OCTA上的模式I CNV与传统多模态成像上的A组病例之间的对应率为94.9%。还计算出OCTA上的模式II CNV与传统多模态成像上的B组(不需要治疗)病例之间的对应率为90.5%。在传统多模态成像中的治疗决策以及OCTA成像分析中定义的模式(I或II)方面,观察者间一致性都很高(P<0.05)。
本研究表明,在渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者中,OCTA上识别的不同CNV模式与传统多模态成像确定的治疗决策之间具有高度对应性。虽然荧光素血管造影仍然是确定渗漏存在的金标准,OCT显示积液及其变化,但OCTA现在可以提供对CNV的无创监测,有助于在随访期间做出每个治疗决策。