Grande Antonio Jose, Silva Valter, Maddocks Matthew
University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Population Health Oxford, UK ; Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Laboratory of evidence-based practice Criciuma, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Department of Internal Medicine Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015 Sep;6(3):208-11. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12055. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
Cancer cachexia is a complex syndrome characterized by an ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass and progressive functional impairment. A proactive management approach is recommended, including physical exercise to maintain function via modulation of muscle metabolism, insulin sensitivity and levels of inflammation. The review aimed to determine the safety, acceptability and effectiveness of exercise in adults with cancer cachexia. Secondary aims, subject to the data availability, were to compare effectiveness according to the characteristics of the study intervention or population.
We sought randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults meeting international criteria for cancer cachexia, comparing a programme of exercise as a sole or adjunct intervention to usual care or an active control. CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE and HTA, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, PEDro, SciVerse SCOPUS, Biosis Previews PreMEDLINE and Open Grey databases were searched up to June 2014. Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility.
We screened 3154 separate titles and abstracts, and reviewed 16 full-texts. Corresponding authors were contacted to determine if samples met cachexia staging criteria. Most authors did not explore this concept. No trial met review eligibility criteria. We were unable to perform a meta-analysis to determine any effects from exercise intervention.
Despite a strong rationale for the use of exercise, there is insufficient evidence to determine safety and effectiveness in patients with cancer cachexia. Findings from ongoing studies are awaited. Assessment of cachexia domains, ideally against international criteria, is required for future trials of exercise and supportive care interventions.
癌症恶病质是一种复杂的综合征,其特征是骨骼肌质量持续丧失和功能逐渐受损。建议采用积极的管理方法,包括通过调节肌肉代谢、胰岛素敏感性和炎症水平进行体育锻炼以维持功能。本综述旨在确定运动对患有癌症恶病质的成年人的安全性、可接受性和有效性。次要目标是根据研究干预措施或人群的特征比较有效性,但取决于数据的可用性。
我们在符合癌症恶病质国际标准的成年人中寻找随机对照试验(RCT),将运动计划作为唯一或辅助干预措施与常规护理或积极对照进行比较。截至2014年6月,检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、DARE和HTA、ISI科学网、LILACS、PEDro、SciVerse SCOPUS、Biosis Previews PreMEDLINE和Open Grey数据库。两位作者独立评估研究的 eligibility。
我们筛选了3154个单独的标题和摘要,并审查了16篇全文。联系了通讯作者以确定样本是否符合恶病质分期标准。大多数作者没有探讨这个概念。没有试验符合综述的 eligibility 标准。我们无法进行荟萃分析来确定运动干预的任何效果。
尽管有充分的理由使用运动,但仍缺乏足够的证据来确定运动对癌症恶病质患者的安全性和有效性。正在等待正在进行的研究结果。未来运动和支持性护理干预试验需要评估恶病质领域,理想情况下应根据国际标准进行评估。