Suppr超能文献

用于恶病质管理的多模式干预措施。

Multimodal interventions for cachexia management.

作者信息

Reid Joanne, Blair Carolyn, Dempster Martin, McKeaveney Clare, Slee Adrian, Fitzsimons Donna

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD015749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015749.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cachexia (disease-related wasting) is a complex metabolic syndrome which occurs in people with chronic illnesses, including cancer, HIV/AIDS, kidney disease, heart disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People with cachexia experience unintentional weight loss, muscle loss, fatigue, loss of appetite, and reduced quality of life. Multimodal interventions which work synergistically to treat the syndrome could lead to benefits.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of multimodal interventions aimed at alleviating or stabilising cachexia in people with a chronic illness.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and two trials registers in July 2024, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with or at risk of cachexia, comparing multimodal interventions combining two or more modalities (of pharmacology, nutrition, exercise) to treatment as usual, variation of the intervention, or unimodal intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened potentially eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB 1). Primary outcomes were physical function, strength, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were body composition and weight, quality of life (QoL), appetite, fatigue, and biochemical markers. We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine studies with 926 adults (mean age: 63 years). Study sample sizes ranged from 20 to 332 participants. Six studies were conducted in Europe, and one each in Turkey, New Zealand, and the USA. There were six studies in people with cancer, and one each in people with COPD, chronic kidney disease, and HIV/AIDS. We judged four studies to be at an overall high risk of bias, and five at an overall unclear risk. All outcomes in all comparisons had very low-certainty evidence, downgraded once for risk of bias and/or indirectness and twice for imprecision. Multimodal intervention (pharmacological, nutritional, and/or exercise) compared to treatment as usual One cancer study randomised 46 participants, with 41 included in all analyses except adverse events. The study assessed outcomes immediately after treatment, lasting six weeks. Compared to treatment as usual, there is no clear evidence for an effect of a multimodal intervention on: physical function (mean difference (MD) -16.10 m, 95% confidence interval (CI) -79.06 to 46.86; 41 participants); strength (MD 3.80 kg, 95% CI -3.21 to 10.81; 41 participants); adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 1.36, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.65; 46 participants); body composition (MD 7.89 cm, 95% CI -10.43 to 26.21; 41 participants); weight (MD 5.89 kg, 95% CI -1.45 to 13.23; 41 participants); appetite (MD 0.68 points, 95% CI -0.60 to 1.96; 41 participants); fatigue (MD 0.12, 95% CI -1.05 to 1.29; 41 participants); and biochemical markers (MD 2%, 95% CI 0.99 to 3.01; 41 participants), but the evidence was very uncertain; QoL was not reported. Multimodal intervention compared to variation of the intervention Three cancer studies and one HIV/AIDS study randomised 192 participants. We could not use the available data, nor obtain additional data, from two studies (one in cancer, one in HIV/AIDS). The studies assessed outcomes immediately after treatment, ranging from three to seven months. Compared to a variation of the intervention, there is no clear evidence for an effect of a multimodal intervention on: physical function (MD 10.0 m, 95% CI -36.27 to 56.27; 1 study, 56 participants); strength (MD 0.7 kg, 95% CI -3.75 to 5.15; 1 study, 56 participants); adverse events (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.02; P = 0.75, I = 0%; 2 studies, 95 participants); body composition (MD -2.67 kg, 95% CI -5.89 to 0.54; P = 0.10, I = 0%; 2 studies, 95 participants); weight (MD -2.47 kg, 95% CI -7.11 to 2.16; P = 0.30, I = 0%; 2 studies, 95 participants); QoL (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.15, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.26; P = 0.47, I = 0%; 2 studies, 95 participants); appetite (SMD -0.34, 95% CI -1.27 to 0.59; P = 0.48, I = 79%; 2 studies, 95 participants); fatigue (MD 6.40 points, 95% CI -1.10 to 13.90; 1 study, 56 participants); or biochemical markers (MD 9.80 pg/mL, 95% CI -6.25 to 25.85; P = 0.23, I = 73%; 2 studies, 95 participants), but the evidence is very uncertain. Multimodal intervention compared to unimodal intervention We included six studies (802 participants) in this comparison: three cancer studies, and one each in people with COPD, chronic kidney disease, and HIV/AIDS. The studies assessed outcomes immediately after treatment, ranging from three to seven months. We could not use the available data, nor obtain additional data, from the HIV/AIDS study. Compared to a unimodal intervention, there is no clear evidence for an effect of a multimodal intervention on: physical function (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.26; P = 0.86, I = 0%; 2 studies, 348 participants); strength (SMD 0.23, 95% CI -0.81 to 1.27; P = 0.66, I = 0%; 2 studies, 348 participants); adverse events (RR 0.87, 95% CI -0.43 to 1.73; P = 0.68, I = 45%; 2 studies, 395 participants); body composition (SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.50; P = 0.58, I = 74%; 5 studies, 742 participants); body weight (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.33; P = 0.90, I = 49%; 4 studies, 431 participants); QoL (SMD 0.22, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.73; P = 0.39, I = 61%; 3 studies, 411 participants); appetite (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.40; P = 0.72, I = 58%; 2 studies, 395 participants); fatigue (MD -6.80 points, 95% CI -12.44 to -1.17; 1 study, 244 participants); and biochemical markers (SMD 0.11, 95% CI -0.59 to 0.80; P = 0.76, I = 79%; 3 studies, 411 participants), but the evidence is very uncertain.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The review found insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of multimodal interventions in managing cachexia. The certainty of the evidence was very low. Methodologically rigorous, well-powered RCTs with adequate interaction times are needed to assess the effectiveness of multimodal interventions in managing cachexia across chronic illnesses.

摘要

背景

恶病质(疾病相关性消瘦)是一种复杂的代谢综合征,发生于患有慢性疾病的人群中,包括癌症、艾滋病毒/艾滋病、肾脏疾病、心脏病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。患有恶病质的人会出现非自愿体重减轻、肌肉流失、疲劳、食欲不振和生活质量下降。协同作用以治疗该综合征的多模式干预可能会带来益处。

目的

评估旨在减轻或稳定慢性病患者恶病质的多模式干预的益处和危害。

检索方法

我们于2024年7月检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO以及两个试验注册库,并进行参考文献核对、引文检索以及与研究作者联系以识别研究。

入选标准

我们纳入了患有恶病质或有恶病质风险的成年人的随机对照试验(RCT),比较了将两种或更多种模式(药理学、营养、运动)联合的多模式干预与常规治疗、干预的变体或单模式干预。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立筛选潜在符合条件的研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险(RoB 1)。主要结局为身体功能、力量和不良事件。次要结局为身体成分和体重、生活质量(QoL)、食欲、疲劳和生化指标。我们使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。

主要结果

我们纳入了9项研究,共926名成年人(平均年龄:63岁)。研究样本量从20至332名参与者不等。6项研究在欧洲进行,土耳其、新西兰和美国各有1项。有6项研究针对癌症患者,慢性阻塞性肺疾病、慢性肾病和艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者各有1项。我们判定4项研究总体偏倚风险高,5项总体偏倚风险不明确。所有比较中的所有结局均具有极低确定性的证据,因偏倚风险和/或间接性而被降级一次,因不精确性而被降级两次。多模式干预(药理学、营养和/或运动)与常规治疗相比 一项癌症研究将46名参与者随机分组,除不良事件外,41名参与者纳入所有分析。该研究在治疗后立即评估结局,持续6周。与常规治疗相比,没有明确证据表明多模式干预对以下方面有影响:身体功能(平均差(MD)-16.10 m,95%置信区间(CI)-79.06至46.86;41名参与者);力量(MD 3.80 kg,95% CI -3.21至10.81;41名参与者);不良事件(风险比(RR)1.36,95% CI 0.70至2.65;46名参与者);身体成分(MD 7.89 cm,95% CI -10.43至26.21;41名参与者);体重(MD 5.89 kg,95% CI -1.45至13.23;41名参与者);食欲(MD 0.68分,95% CI -0.60至1.96;41名参与者);疲劳(MD 0.12,95% CI -1.05至1.29;41名参与者);以及生化指标(MD 2%,95% CI 0.99至3.01;41名参与者),但证据非常不确定;未报告生活质量。多模式干预与干预变体相比 三项癌症研究和一项艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究将192名参与者随机分组。我们无法使用两项研究(一项针对癌症,一项针对艾滋病毒/艾滋病)的现有数据,也无法获取额外数据。这些研究在治疗后立即评估结局,持续3至7个月。与干预变体相比,没有明确证据表明多模式干预对以下方面有影响:身体功能(MD 10.0 m,95% CI -36.27至56.27;1项研究,56名参与者);力量(MD 0.7 kg,95% CI -3.75至5.15;1项研究,56名参与者);不良事件(RR 0.87,95% CI 0.38至2.02;P = 0.75,I = 0%;2项研究,95名参与者);身体成分(MD -2.67 kg,95% CI -5.89至0.54;P = 0.10,I = 0%;2项研究,95名参与者);体重(MD -2.47 kg,95% CI -7.11至2.16;P = 0.30,I = 0%;2项研究,95名参与者);生活质量(标准化平均差(SMD)-0.15,95% CI -0.55至0.26;P = 0.47,I = 0%;2项研究,95名参与者);食欲(SMD -0.34,95% CI -1.27至0.59;P = 0.48,I = 79%;2项研究,95名参与者);疲劳(MD 6.40分,95% CI -

相似文献

1
Multimodal interventions for cachexia management.用于恶病质管理的多模式干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD015749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015749.pub2.
4
Physical activity for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.体力活动治疗肠易激综合征。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 29;6(6):CD011497. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011497.pub2.
5
Pulmonary rehabilitation versus usual care for adults with asthma.肺康复治疗与常规护理对哮喘成人的影响比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD013485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013485.pub2.
6
Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia.产后缺铁性贫血女性的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 13;12(12):CD010861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010861.pub3.
9
10
Yoga for fatigue in people with cancer.瑜伽对癌症患者疲劳的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 27;5(5):CD015520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015520.

本文引用的文献

1
The lived experience of renal cachexia: An interpretive phenomenological analysis.肾性恶病质的生活体验:一项诠释现象学分析。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Aug 22;7:100235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100235. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Cancer Cachexia: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update.癌症恶病质:美国临床肿瘤学会指南快速推荐更新
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;41(25):4178-4179. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01280. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
6
Overview of FDA Drug Approval and Labeling.美国食品药品监督管理局药物批准与标签概述
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Dec;10(12):3051-3056. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.09.005.
9
Pathophysiology of cachexia and characteristics of dysphagia in chronic diseases.慢性疾病中恶病质的病理生理学及吞咽困难的特征
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Jul 22;9(10):100120. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100120. eCollection 2022 Oct.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验