Korbe Samuel, Udoji Esther N, Ness Timothy J, Udoji Mercy A
Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Pain Manag. 2015;5(6):465-82. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.46. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
Ultrasonography has multiple advantages over traditional radiologic imaging modalities when used for interventional procedures. It allows improved visualization of the anatomy while avoiding ionizing radiation and risks associated with contrast use. It has proved superiority at accuracy of delivery and procedural effectiveness over blind procedures when used in association with interventional pain procedures. Although limited in its ability to see through bony structures, ultrasound has utility in visualizing soft tissues and vascular structures in anatomic regions of interest resulting in increased use for posterior neuraxial, periaxial, peripheral nerve and joint-related structures. Current evidence for use in these settings is presented here. In some cases, optimal utility may be improved by combining ultrasonography with other imaging modalities.
在用于介入操作时,超声检查相对于传统放射成像方式具有多种优势。它能更好地显示解剖结构,同时避免电离辐射以及与使用造影剂相关的风险。在与介入性疼痛治疗联合使用时,它在给药准确性和操作有效性方面已证明优于盲目操作。尽管超声穿透骨性结构的能力有限,但它在可视化感兴趣解剖区域的软组织和血管结构方面具有实用价值,从而在用于后轴索、轴周、周围神经及关节相关结构时的应用有所增加。本文介绍了目前在这些情况下使用的证据。在某些情况下,将超声检查与其他成像方式相结合可能会提高其最佳效用。