Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey VAMC, Houston, Texas.
Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;67(11):2897-904. doi: 10.1002/art.39271.
Pain is not always correlated with severity of radiographic osteoarthritis (OA), possibly because people modify activities to manage symptoms. Measures of symptoms that consider pain in the context of activity level may therefore provide greater discrimination than a measure of pain alone. We undertook this study to compare discrimination provided by a measure of pain alone with that provided by combined measures of pain in the context of physical activity across radiographic OA severity levels.
This was a cross-sectional study nested within the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). The population was drawn from 2,127 persons enrolled in an OAI accelerometer monitoring substudy, including those with and those without knee OA. Two composite pain and activity knee symptom (PAKS) scores were calculated as the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score (plus 1) divided by a physical activity measure (step count for the first PAKS score [PAKS1 score] and activity count for the second PAKS score [PAKS2 score]). Symptom score discrimination across Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grades was evaluated using histograms and quantile regression.
A total of 1,806 participants (55.5% of whom were women) were included (mean ± SD age 65.1 ± 9.1 years, mean ± SD body mass index 28.4 ± 4.8 kg/m(2) ). The WOMAC pain score, but not the PAKS scores, exhibited a floor effect. The adjusted median WOMAC pain scores by K/L grades 0-4 were 0, 0, 0, 1, and 3, respectively. The adjusted median PAKS1 scores were 24.9, 26.0, 32.4, 46.1, and 97.9, respectively, and the adjusted median PAKS2 scores were 7.2, 7.2, 9.2, 12.9, and 23.8, respectively. The PAKS scores had more statistically significant comparisons between K/L grades than did the WOMAC pain score.
Symptom assessments incorporating pain and physical activity did not exhibit a floor effect and were better able to discriminate radiographic severity than an assessment of pain alone, particularly in milder disease. Pain in the context of physical activity level should be used to assess knee OA symptoms.
疼痛与放射学骨关节炎(OA)的严重程度并不总是相关,这可能是因为人们为了控制症状而改变了活动方式。因此,考虑到活动水平的情况下对症状进行评估,可能比仅评估疼痛的方法更具辨别力。我们进行这项研究是为了比较单独评估疼痛和综合评估疼痛与活动水平相结合在不同放射学 OA 严重程度下提供的辨别力。
这是一项嵌套在骨关节炎倡议(OAI)中的横断面研究。该人群来自于参加 OAI 加速度计监测子研究的 2127 名参与者,包括膝关节炎和无膝关节炎患者。两个综合疼痛和活动膝关节症状(PAKS)评分是通过将 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛评分(加 1)除以物理活动测量值(第一个 PAKS 评分的步数[PAKS1 评分]和第二个 PAKS 评分的活动计数[PAKS2 评分])计算得出的。使用直方图和分位数回归评估症状评分在 Kellgren/Lawrence(K/L)分级之间的辨别力。
共有 1806 名参与者(55.5%为女性)被纳入研究(平均年龄 65.1±9.1 岁,平均 BMI 28.4±4.8kg/m²)。WOMAC 疼痛评分,但不是 PAKS 评分,表现出地板效应。按 K/L 分级 0-4 调整的 WOMAC 疼痛评分中位数分别为 0、0、0、1 和 3。调整后的 PAKS1 评分中位数分别为 24.9、26.0、32.4、46.1 和 97.9,调整后的 PAKS2 评分中位数分别为 7.2、7.2、9.2、12.9 和 23.8。与 WOMAC 疼痛评分相比,PAKS 评分在 K/L 分级之间具有更显著的统计学差异。
综合评估疼痛和身体活动的症状评估没有地板效应,并且比单独评估疼痛更能辨别放射学严重程度,尤其是在轻度疾病中。应使用疼痛与身体活动水平相结合的方式来评估膝关节 OA 症状。